Entries Tagged as ''

Cohabitating with Special Privileges

Here is a quick thought about the churches and homosexuality. It is something that people who oppose the present teaching by churches on homosexuality and those who support it can both agree on.

 

Why is it that churches feel a need to work so tirelessly against homosexuals and “their agenda”, while at the same time welcoming couples who are unmarried and live together into their congregations and making no mention of it.

 

The reason I compare these two is because – according to an important factor of church dogma – they are the exact same thing. Sex out of wedlock is the issue in both cases.

 

Gay couples are “living in sin” in part because they are engaging in intimate relations with one another and doing so outside the bounds of holy matrimony. But the same can be said about the preponderance of couples in modern society who live together and who are not married. I would say that almost a quarter of the young couples I marry these days have children together before they get to the altar. So, there is no way that they are cohabitating chastely.

 

There are only three solutions to this mess, as I see it, and all require a greater degree of consistency on the part of the church and it’s witness to the world.

 

First, admit that cohabitation is not a sin and so homosexuality (or at least the cohabitation argument) is not a sin either.

 

Second, admit that homosexuality as cohabitation is a sin and so is all the other cohabitation going on. Kick the straight couples out church, refuse to marry them, preach against them, and require more discipline among the elect of God.

 

Third, admit that they are the same thing – bad, but not the end of the world. Most preachers and churches do not condone cohabitation, but they spend very little time fighting it. After all, there are two wars going on, the rich are getting richer at the expense of the rest of us, we have a lawless president in the White House, two parties who like to complain but do nothing about it, an education system that does not correlate to our wealth, abusive relationships, child molestation, widespread meaninglessness and hopelessness, and so much more. Perhaps as a church there are more important things we can worry about. We’ll get to this other stuff when we are ready to take a breath.

 

 

Jerry Falwell

Rev. Jerry Fallwell collapsed at his Liberty University office today and died. He was 73.

It maybe goes without saying that Rev. Falwell and myself were on different sides of the aisle on almost all major social and political issues. However, I wish him God’s speed all the same.

He was a dedicated follower of Christ and a believer in the power and renewal of the Church. He understood the centrality of scripture and the feedom that the Holy Spirit gives each and everyone of us to become true children of God. He and I may have had totally different ideas about how all that plays out, but at heart we were Christian brothers.

I have taken more than a few occasions to preach rebuttals to his crusades. But I will always appreciate one talk he gave on Larry King Live about ten years ago. He was asked if he had any regrets about his long career as a public theologian and preacher. He said he had a big one. When the civil rights movement was in full swing in the 50s and 60s, he was approached by several Black Baptist churches to join in their cause and he said “No, that’s not right.” He did not say it out of prejudice, but out of his support for the traditional conviction that Baptists support the separation of the Church from the world. He said that night on Larry King that he had made a terrible mistake and had missed being a part of a great work by God in the world. He used the word “repent”.

Many will applaud the death of Rev. Falwell, but by doing so they show themselves to be lesser men than he was. He showed more humility, more willingness to change, and more concern for all God’s children than most people suspect - even if he went about it differently than say I would.

Jerry, I’ll miss thinking you were wrong, but wondering how we talked so much alike. Thank you for reminding me the Church is bigger than my own wisodm. Peace be upon you. For all our differences, I pray you will be greeted in heaven with the same words I hope one day to hear: “Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!” (Matthew 25:21)

Advice for Mitt

I have been asked more than a few times, as a pastor in a liberal church with evangelical pretenses, my opinion of Mitt Romney and his “Mormonism”.

            Well, I have thought a little about this and I have come to one conclusion. Gov. Romney should join the Democrat Party.

            Here are some of my thoughts:

1.   Most people in America do not know the first thing about Mormonism. This works both against Romney in conservative circles and for him in liberal ones. 

   It works against him among staunch Christians whom he needs to win over just to get a chance at the big chair in November ‘08. Most practicing, reasonable knowledgeable Christians still know little or nothing about Mormonism. What they do know is that they are “not like us”, “don’t believe what we believe”, “pervert the faith”, and so on. Without knowing about Mormonism, most Christians think it’s creepy at best.

   As for liberals of a more secular nature, most probably think a Mormon is an immigrant The Republic of Mormonia, somewhere near the Balkans. Those who actually know a Mormon is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints, probably think that outfit is no more or less evil than any other brand of Christian. At best it is a gain for him, and worse it effects him not at all. I can only believe that this is how Senate Dem leader Harry Reid slipped by.

2. Being different has not often been a boon in Republican circles. Just ask Steve Forbes, Barry Goldwater, or that Kermit the Frog wannabe Gary Baur. No, the more normal, defined, and “like-the-rest-o-‘em” you are, the better.   Lots of liberals, on the other hand, love to show off the minority in the family. Having someone a little different around just shows the other ladies at the cocktail party how truly liberal and inclusive you really are while you sip your gin and juice. Having a devout Mormon and Republican who once argued for civil unions, gun control, and immigration reform at the head of a Democrat tickets would make us feel so bloody superior we would run in droves to vote for him.

3. Republicans have a tendency to get bored when people start speaking about being oppressed, or victimized, or marginalized in anyway. After all, no master likes to hear what the slaves say in the pantry all by themselves. Republicans do not care what oppressed group Jesse Jackson has had a heretofore unacknowledged lifetime interest in this week. The Republican motto has always been: “Suck it up and act like a man.” Even if you are a woman.   Democrats on the other hand love marginalized people. Blacks, women, Latinos, GLBTs, you name it. The Democrats love you and want to work for you. Well, what about the most select and never before represented group in history: multi-millionaire straight white fundamentalist men religiously persecuted as atheists by liberal Black preachers. Man, that’s so twisted and mean, no one even thought it up until “Diamond Al” came along. Mitt, only the Dems can truly know your pain.

4.  But the best reason to join the Democrats is the simplest. Republicans don’t believe in God but like to talk about nothing other than God while using their pseudo faith to beat down whoever they don’t like this week. Democrats actually go to church but do not like to bring their faith into the voting booth. Romney has been asking people to do just that. Acknowledge him as a person of faith and know that he is not the same as his church when he’s in a governor’s mansion or, maybe one day, the oval office. Mitt, I’ll see you in Denver next August!

Islamikazes and Billboards

Shame on the Good News Independent Baptist Church in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Last week they placed on their message board in front of their church the following message: “When is the last time you heard of a Jew or Christian with a bomb strapped to their body?”

On the other side was a message which indicated that the message of Islam is: “submit, convert or die.”

Now, I am not one of those defenders who claims that Islam is a religion of peace. I think Islam has a very violent and unfortunate past. Islam did spread at the end of a sword and that is part of the agreed historical record.

However, I think Islam is no better or worse than any other religion on this record - including Christianity.

Somewhere between a legacy of crusades, segregation, king-making, Sharpton calling Romney an atheist, a million sermons about the sinfulness of sex, the war against science and reason, the Syllabus of Errors, Church endorsed colonialism and racism, and so much more - maybe we should not be throwing stones, eh?

Hearing and Seeing

            I’ve been thinking further on the whole questions of Christians and Jews.
            For the disciples, for Paul, and for most early Christians, there was a real confusion about two things:
            One, why did the majority of Jews not hear the story of Jesus and immediately believe. After all, they had the Bible. They had known God for thousands of years. They knew that the messiah was coming. Why did they not recognize him when he came?
            And two, how come all these people, these non-Jewish Gentiles who had never known the God of the Jews before, how come they were all converting? Why is it that the people who should know, do not; and those who should not know, do? Why is it backwards? After all, if you could stand before all this and guess, you probably would have guessed that the Jews would have been the easy converts. It’s the Gentile pagans, with their many gods and strange myths who should have been the ones who did not get it. What happened? What went wrong?
            Not a little bit of the letters of Paul and the other apostles are dedicated to just this problem.
            And here is the thing. This is not an ancient problem either. We are still scratching our heads about why those who should know, do not, and those who shouldn’t do. How is it that so many people born and raised in the church drift away, but so many who were never in a church except for a baptism, wedding or funeral, become great and powerful spiritual leaders. This is still a great mystery of our Christian life.
            I wish that I could say there is some great insight about this that comes out the scriptures and traditions of mother Church, but there just isn’t. Not really. Whenever the great theologians and spiritual writers speak about this, they say too much. They end up producing ideas and theories which are neither biblical nor comforting. The doctrine of predestination came out of one attempt to explain this very phenomenon of believers and non-believers.
            Truthfully, the Bible itself just lets this paradox stand. It chooses not to explain, not really. It gives a lot of half ideas, but never anything that is offered as some sort of absolute dogma for all times.
Sometimes the Bible will imply that believing is all the choice of the individual. You choose to believe or you choose not to believe. Andrew, Peter, John and James were all fishing one day. And Jesus walked up to them and said, “Follow me.” They dropped their nets and they followed. They could have done otherwise, but they did not. They chose to follow Jesus.
            Methodists have always liked this, since we are a tradition based on the idea of personal choice and the freedom of the Christian before God.
            But, as our Calvinist brethren will sometimes point out, there are other times when the Bible suggests that people not believing has something to do with God. There are more than a few times when the Bible says God hardened this person’s heart or that person’s heart. And there are plenty of passages that say something like “all who were appointed for eternal life believed”. It implies that everyone who believed did so because of God, not because of themselves.
 

            Personally, I like to stick with Jesus on this whole matter. Jesus ends many of his parables with one simple line: “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”  He is borrowing a passage which comes from the prophet Ezekiel, who recounts that God saying to him: “Son of man, you are living among a rebellious people. They have eyes to see but do not see and ears to hear but do not hear, for they are a rebellious people.” 

            There are some people who just hear it and get it and understand it. And, there are just some people who do not.

            I have a good friend who is an atheist. When I ask her why she is an atheist she politely says that there is no malice in it. She does not hate God. She does not think religious people are crazy. She does not hate the Church. She does not think that religion is a drug or that we are delusional. She does not think that Christians have done more or less harm in the world than anyone else, that we are more or less hypocritical than the next person on the street.             The way she describes it, when she looks up to the sky at night, she just sees stars. That’s it. Nothing more. She has no sense of that there is something more out there. All she can see and hear is that this is all there is. Like anyone else, she has ears to hear and eyes to see, but that is all she sees and hears.             And I contrast that with myself. I cannot remember a time when I did not hear, see, and feel in my gut that there was something else. When I look up at the night sky, with the swirling of galaxies and stars and quasars and all of it – I also see the hand of God. And try as I might, I cannot look at the night sky any other way.

            For whatever reason, however it happens or happened, I am one of those people that Jesus speaks about when he says if you have ears, then hear. And she is not.

            Time for a disclaimer: the Bible does not say that those who do nor hear God’s call are the same as those who are going to Hell. So, don’t inform all your atheist friends that they will never hear God and they’re all gonna fry like a well done wiener at a Fourth of July roast.

            The Bible simply says that when it comes to belief, some have vision and hearing, others do not. Final judgment is a whole other thing. The best example of that is Matthew 25 where Jesus tells some people at the end of time they will go to heaven because when He was hungry and they gave him something to eat, when He was thirsty and they gave him something to drink, when He was a stranger and they invited him in, when He needed clothes and they clothed him, and so forth. And they are surprised because they never saw Him when they did any of that. Jesus tells them, “whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.” But the reason He had to tell them was because they were blind to His presence all along. They did not have eyes to see and ears to hear.

            Like my atheist friend, they looked at the poor, hungry, thirsty, naked, stranger and saw just that – a poor, hungry, thirsty, naked, stranger. Nothing more. They did not see Jesus Himself. But that does not mean they are going to hell. In fact, the opposite is very much the case.

            For whatever inexplicable reason, some people have eyes to see and others do not. Maybe the Calvinists are right and this is God’s doing. Maybe we Methodists are right and this is all a choice. I don’t know.
            I do know this: I never chose to believe in God. I just did and do. I am the lamest Christian in the world. I have no amazing conversion story. I have no miraculous turn about in my life. I have no moment when all was dark and suddenly I walked into a clearing and beheld light as if for the first time. . .  I have always beheld the light of God as if for the first time.

            And lots of Christians I know are the same way. Even many who have had born-again experiences. Many report that at the moment of their conversion they knew that, in a sense, they has always believed, always known God was there, always had a heart for the Lord, but they had never known it until that time – that there conversion was less a change of heart and more a moment of enlightenment and awakening when they realized what was what, what they had in a sense always believed.
            So, maybe the Calvinists are half right, but I also know this:
            There have been times in my life when I have seen a trailed for a movie and thought, “I’d really like to see that movie. It looks great.” But then I never do. There are many who stand outside the doors of the Church and fellowship of Jesus Christ and think to themselves, “I should really go there. I think that would be great. That would meaningful. I’ll bet being a part of that would really change things.” But then they don’t.
            So, maybe the Methodists are half right too.
 

            But either way, the Bible puts it plain: Some hear, others don’t. Some receive, and other reject. And that is the way of it.
 

            Some can say: “Holy God! You are a God for me, even me! You gave your Son Jesus for me. You let you own child die, and horribly at that, for me, a nobody, a nothing. Me! I would never have done that for you. But it did not stop you from doing that for me! Lord, I am yours from here on out. Blessed me your name forever.”
            Others stand at the side and say, “What a bunch of malarkey! Who needs that! What we’ve got it is good and true. Who ever heard of such a thing? What silliness? What unsophisticated drivel! What hypocrites! What a shame to be one of them. Glad I am where I’m at.”
            Some hear, and other can’t catch the tune.
            If you are bothering to read this blog, it is probable because you are one of those people who can hear. Maybe not well. I can’t claim to have perfect pitch when it comes to the Word of God, either. But you are one of those people who – for whatever reason – has vision. I hope you wake up every morning and thank God for that. You are blessed. We are blessed for that.
            And if you do not have that vision, I ask you to pray for it and perhaps it will come. Or ask for the experience of others or myself, and perhaps through our seeing you too will see.
            The one thing Jesus leaves out in His parables is the one thing that goes without saying: if you are seer or a hearer, there is nothing like it. If you see and hear, it is like being blind but having perfect vision, like being deaf but hearing everything. It is an awareness of what happens beyond the veil of the visible world, of the reality that is behind reality, that is more real than reality itself.
            I’d go on, but frankly, words are too poor and small. If you have eyes to see and ears to hear, you know what I am talking about anyway. And if you don’t, you can’t know until the scales have dropped and you have looked into the depths and see God staring back at you.
            Receive! Hear! See!

Traveling Towards an Open Heaven

By Savi Hensman - posted on ekklesia.co.uk at this site here.
9 May 2007
From the outside it is easy to conclude that the main division between those rather easily pigeonholed ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’ in the Anglican Communion, as in other branches of the Christian faith, revolves around matters of sexual ethics. In reality the arguments are more foundational, though what they have in common is attempts to wrestle decisive meaning from biblical texts which are rich, varied and complex.So, one of the reasons given by certain Episcopal churches for breaking away from the denomination in the USA is that “The Episcopal Church has departed from the authority of the Holy Scriptures and from historic Christian teaching on the uniqueness of Jesus Christ as the only Lord and Saviour of humankind.” In other word, whether Christians alone can be saved (restored from captivity to death and granted fullness of life by God) remains a hotly debated question in some churches.  

The Presiding Bishop in The Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, has been condemned by some for her view that, while for Christians “our route to God is through Jesus”, people of other beliefs approach God through their own cultural contexts and “experience God in human relationships, as well as ones that transcend human relationships”. It is claimed that this contradicts the position that, in the Johannine account of Jesus’ words, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14.6).

Elsewhere too – especially in South Asia, where respect for other religions is fundamental to many Christians – numerous Anglicans risk being condemned as heretical for supposedly straying from biblical orthodoxy.

However some New Testament writers appear to take the view that being a Christian is not necessary for salvation. According to the Beatitudes, for instance, mercy will be shown to the merciful, to the poor, to those who mourn, and to peacemakers – who will be called children of God (Matthew 5.1-12). Later in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus is quoted as saying that “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven”, while many who believe that they have done great works in Jesus’ name will be condemned as evildoers (Matthew 7.21-23).

It is debatable whether any will be ultimately lost, or whether the ‘refiner’s fire’ (Malachi 3.2-3, Isaiah 48.10), when humans are painfully stripped of their illusions and brought face to face with the truth, can melt even hearts of stone. In any case, Matthew’s gospel appears to value reflection of God’s generous love over ideology of any kind. “If you forgive others their trespasses,” Jesus’ listeners are told, “your heavenly Father will also forgive you” (Matthew 6.14).

In the famous parable of the sheep and goats, it is not those with pious words on their lips but those who have fed the hungry, welcomed the alien, cared for the sick and visited the imprisoned who are invited to possess the kingdom, to their considerable surprise (Matthew 25.31-46). What they have done for the lowliest on earth they have done for the king, both ‘Son of Man’ – embodying what humanity can, should and will be – and ‘Son of the Father’.

In John’s gospel, too, Jesus of Nazareth, born at a particular historical moment and into a particular cultural setting – is identified with one who transcends space and time, the universal Christ. According to John, in the beginning is the Word (divine reason), without whom nothing is made, in whom is the life which enlightens everyone. It is this way, life and truth which is enfleshed in Jesus and which reveals the true heart of God (a contextual reading of John 14.6). Those who oppose his works of mercy and liberation, though they may think they are championing obedience to the literal words of God, are rejecting this truth.

In this way, the world’s (and religion’s) expectations are turned upside down: the Almighty stoops to wash feet and is executed for blasphemy and sedition.

While the exact mechanisms of redemption remain open to debate, the crucifixion and resurrection of one in whom humanity and divinity are in perfect concurrence is presented as the pivotal event in history. Salvation is offered, not from the vengeance of an authoritarian deity but from the personal and social consequences of failure to love. People and communities need no longer be trapped by hatred and fear, pursuit of wealth, power and all that does not, in the end, satisfy; death no more reigns.

It might appear that, while following Jesus is the way to salvation, there may be other ways of relating to Christ, whether recognised and named or not. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God in them (1 John 4.16). God will not force people to choose the way of love and truth, but those who are open can be transformed and play their part in God’s transformation of a world wracked by division and pain into a realm of love and peace.

This is not a mere liberal embracing of all faiths. In examining any tradition, it may be worth asking whether it leads to good news or bad for the poor and downtrodden, whether its followers are supported in becoming more Christ-like or encouraged to devalue and mistreat their neighbour. In Luke’s gospel, when Jesus faces hostility from the pious, he proclaims that Wisdom is justified by all her children (Luke 7.35, see also Matthew 11.19). He often draws on the legacy of Wisdom, whom some identify with the Spirit: present from the dawn of creation, those who search for her find her, and her path is the path of justice (Proverbs 3.19-20, 8.17, 20).

Superficial judgement is not enough: faith communities may be divided between the wise and unwise, those who cultivate understanding and compassion and those who spurn them. “The wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere,” writes James in his epistle (letter). “And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace” (James 3.17-18).

There are indeed New Testament passages which might be read as indicating that it is only Christians (or indeed some Christians) who will be granted God’s mercy and life. But readers of the Gospels need not struggle to understand why a God held up as a model of generosity by, and embodied in, Jesus would condemn people who, faced with a host of competing belief systems, have picked the wrong one, especially since some will have been put off by misdeeds committed in the name of Christ. God is indeed loving and kind.

The Bible is complex, and those reading it will often draw different conclusions. However those who believe that it is evident from Scripture that non-Christians will be condemned are making unfounded assumptions. Indeed, as Christians, we are at risk of constructing images of God which lead us to dangerous judgementalism towards our neighbour and complacency in our own lives (Matthew 7). It is only by seeking and serving Christ in others, and opening ourselves to grow towards the One in whom humanity is fulfilled and divinity incarnate, that we can be freed and made whole.

Savi Hensman was born in Sri Lanka. She works in the voluntary sector in London. She is an Ekklesia associate.

Super Apostles

Christians and Jews

            I was thinking about the lectionary reading this past week, Acts 44-52. I always get a little nervous about having passages read in my church which can be used as fodder for anti-Semitism – not just that which manifests itself in horrible and demonic ways (like Nazism), but those forms which manifest in more serene ways. A classic example would be the ill feeling or confusion by many Christians about why Jews do not convert when “it is so obvious” that Jesus is the messiah.

            The story Sunday takes place in tone of the many Antiochs of the Middle East. In the back story, Paul and Barnabas have preached in the local synagogue. They proclaimed that Jesus was the Son of God and the Messiah. They preached that he had been murdered but God raised him from the dead. They taught this was the sign. God backed up Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God, because surely God would not have raised a man from the dead who lied about such a thing. But in the end, the Jews in Antioch decided not to go with the whole Jesus thing.

            In response, Paul walked out onto the street, found the local market, picked a nice piece of real estate for himself, and preached to anyone who would listen to him there.

            And while in Antioch, Paul did extremely well. He preached and preached, and more and more people began to show up. And on this particular Sabbath in the story Sunday, it says the “whole city showed up”. The “whole city”! Now, that is probably a slight exaggeration, but it is definitely a sign that there were a whole bunch of people showing up to see what this new teaching was all about.

            There were some who were curious. There were some who were believers. There were people who were probably there to make fun. And, according to Acts, there were the same Jewish leaders who were uninterested in Paul’s message earlier. These leaders, we are told, begin to spread venom against Paul and Barnabas.

            Paul and Barnabas are quick to react. They tell the leaders of the synagogue that the Jews were the first recipients of the Word of God. And now, according the word of God himself, the gospel about Jesus Christ is being preached to all the non-Jews, the Gentiles. And they quote Isaiah 49:6 to back themselves up.

            And then two things happen, we are told. First, the non-Jews who where present love and cherish God more.  They adore that God is for everyone and for all, even them. The other thing that happens is that the Jewish leaders present that day become more embittered, eventually get the authorities of the town to kick Paul and Barnabas out of town.

Passages in the New Testament which talk about the Jews rejecting Jesus have been fodder for a million anti-Semites in the history of the Church. It has been used to fuel medieval ghettoes, Russian gulags, the Nazi holocaust, modern hate crimes, and much more.

When it comes to such passages, it is worth reminding ourselves as Christians what is really going on. Two Jews, Paul and Barnabas, go to Antioch. They preach at a Jewish synagogue. They preach Jesus, a Jewish rabbi, raised from the dead by the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (the Jewish patriarchs). Some Jews encourage them to keep preaching and but other Jews tell them to get lost. They then preach in the street this message of a Jewish God and His Jewish messiah. Consequently, the Jews of that town tell them to get lost. Not all towns, just that town. And what is more, probably not the Jews in that town that had encouraged them to keep preaching.

            This is not an anti-Semitic story. This is a story about a disagreement between a bunch of Jews, some who think Jesus was the Jewish messiah of the Jewish God, some who do not think so, and still others who do not know and want to hear more.

            It would be wrong (and has been wrong) for Christians to walk away from such passages thinking we read a story in our churches about how all the Jews are evil and Christ-haters. We did not. We read a story about honest and pious believers with a genuine disagreement about what God is doing in the world.

            And for what it is worth, we Christians and Jews have been in the same place for 2000 years now. We have a disagreement about the Jewish God and a Jewish rabbi, born to a Jewish mother, who kept Jewish torah (and practiced the Jewish mitzvot very much along the lines of the other Jewish rabbi Shammai), and who may or may not have been the Jewish messiah.

            Turning Jews into two-cent Christ-murderers accomplishes nothing, furthers no dialogue, and dehumanizes those who share the same flesh as our Lord and Savior. We ought – as Christians – to be in a state of repentance every day for the sins of our brethren against our Jewish neighbors and fellow worshippers.

Benedict’s War

There have been quite a few newspaper articles in the last few days about the expected show down between Pope Benedict and the reigning liberation theology of Latin America. The pope is coming to Brazil, in part to confront the issues of the declining membership in the Roman Catholic Church there, but also just to make an appearance as the new pastor of the almost half billion members of his flock who reside there.

It is possible that all this chatter is much ado about nothing. Honestly, there is nothing the press likes more than blood and conflict. What they loved second best is the anticipation of blood and conflict, even if there is no chance it will come. It sells copy and newspapers are businesses.

Benedict had a run in back in the 1980s with leaders of the liberation approach to Christianity in Latin America. He criticized their quasi-Marxist reading of Christianity. However, that was some time ago and he has been quite on this issue for some time. Furthermore, he became very much the protege of John Paul II, and his predecessor became increasingly supportive of many causes of liberation theology while still remaining an opponent on some very central issues.

Benedict might not care when he is there. He might think that liberation theology is old news. Or, he may very well believe that there are more important issues to be dealt with. I hope it is the latter, but I will settle for the former.

The truth is, Benedict will loose all credibility with myself and many other Christians if he goes after the liberationists in Latin America during his trip there. Firstly, he will look like the school bully. It is one thing when a highly placed cardinal goes pushing around people in base communities and working among the poorest of the poor. But is becomes down right sinister when the pope comes to town and makes the little people littler.

If Benedict goes after the liberation theology folks in Brazil and the rest of Latin America, his holiness will have don nothing but picked on a bunch of people who spent their whole working life following the poor Christ of Galilee, given themselves to those the Lord called “least of these”, engaged their world to make it better and more livable for all people, have spread a message of the humanity of Jesus and his concern for all people, have lived the divinity of the Son of God in his allegiance to those people that no one has allegiance to, have lived with the poorest of the poor (some of them in spite of their doctorates and high profile connections with the rich and powerful), and encourage all good Catholics to do likewise.

Benedict better not go after these people. They are WAAAAYYY out of his league.

Suffering, Sobbing and Song

A Homily deliverd in Simpson Memorial Chapel April 12, 2006
by Linda Bales

Ethiopia is a dry, dry land. It is fall in February, and most of the terrain is colored a pale brown. Any harvest that might have been is gone. Every now and then we spot a patch of green, but it is fleeting. Hunger is rampant, and its smell is in the air. Ethiopia ranks seventh from the bottom on the United Nations poverty scale. It’s an agricultural society with 80% unemployment. Clean water is lacking. Education is for those who can pay. Adequate health care is a figment of the imagination.

The look on young girls’ faces in the crime-ridden Merkato area of Addis Ababa haunts those of us who are visitors from a foreign land. We ask them about their dreams. We ask them what they wanted to be. We ask them what they fear most, and their answers remain: rape or abduction. Half of girls under age 15 are married, many to older men who bring them diseases unaware - innocent victims of ignorance and culture with their futures being determined for them before the age of 6.

I became sick and was taken to a community clinic to experience the minimal provision of service given to the many on death’s door. Those who live past age 48 are considered lucky. I am white in a black land. I am privileged and taken to the front of the line. I am weak and guilt-ridden. My mouth is parched. I ask for water and there is none. I use the bathroom which is a hole in the floor in an unlit 2×2 enclosed, putrid space. “My God!” I say.

Some say suffering makes us stronger. Some say we must suffer if we are to find true joy. Some say suffering is the real “stuff of life.”

Jesus came out and went, as was his custom, to the Mount of Olives; the disciples followed him. When he reached the place, he said to them, “Pray that you may not come into the time of trial.” Then he withdrew from them about a stone’s throw, knelt down, and prayed “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me; yet, not my will but yours be done.”

The church is present in Ethiopia. The Orthodox Church claims over half the population as members. The complicity of religion in the suffering of the masses is apparent when we hear the archbishop emphatically denounce the use of condoms even if a married woman needs to use them to protect herself from her AIDS-infected husband. It’s her fault for marrying such a person who violates the religious law. Her life is inconsequential. She might as well be nailed to a cross just like Jesus.

The Psalmist says: “I am weary with my moaning; every night I flood my bed with tears; I drench my couch with my weeping, my eyes waste away because of grief.” “My tears have been my food day and night, while people say to me continually, ‘Where is your God?” Where is this suffering Jesus, Son of God? Our hearts are broken when we hear such tales of woe and, if we cared, righteous anger overcomes our very being. Is Jesus in the midst of this, as some would say? Or are these people of Ethiopia and millions of others who are poor simply pawns on a planet gone mad? Where is this Jesus?

My sobbing began when I arrived home. My tears put me face to face with those who seem so poor. I wonder about their fate. I think about the young girls subjected to cruelty with very little recourse. I think about the women waiting outside the Addis Ababa Fistula Hospital suffering perferoated bladders and/or rectums due to obstructed births. With no access to cesarean sections, these women have no control over their bodily functions. They leak urine constantly and are cast out of their villages. Two million women suffer from this affliction. The suicide rate is high.

The plight of the girl child is alarming. By the age of two, girl children are carrying heavy loads on their heads – water, wood, anything! These weight bearing objects begin to take their toll, and their little bodies become stunted. Their skeletal system is compacted including their pelvic area; thus, resulting in difficult, if not deadly, births. To complicate matters, many are sexually active before their menstrual cycles commence. Out of a population of 77 million people, Ethiopia has only 104 ob/gyns – as many as Washington, DC alone. And, the obstetricians who continue to practice witness 2-3 deaths per day or find themselves acquiring AIDS from delivering babies from AIDS infected moms and having no access to any protective gear.

The gospel says that Jesus wept. Did he weep because he was scared? Or did he weep because he truly realized the meaning and compassion of the word “suffer” and the awesomeness of being human? Some say that Christ was crucified to pay for our sins. I’m not so sure about that. What resonates with me is this suffering Jesus. His claiming his humanity, by loving with abandon, and thereby, catapulting him into pain and grief. And, how often we find ourselves forgetting that Jesus walks with us in all the valleys? How often we neglect to claim him as “best friend”. But, far too often we place him on a pedestal and forget his solidarity with us completely.

Clarence Jordan, one of the founders of Koinonia and author of The Cotton Patch Bible wrote: “Jesus has been so zealously worshipped, his deity so vehemently affirmed, his halo so brightly illumined, and his cross so beautifully polished, that in the minds of many he no longer exists as a man. He has become an exquisite celestial being who momentarily lapsed into a painful involvement in the human scene, and then quite properly returned to his heavenly habitat. By thus glorifying him, we more effectively rid ourselves of him than did those who tried to do so by crudely crucifying him.”

Well, it seems to me that the girls in the Amhara Region, the most destitute area of Ethiopia, know about this suffering Jesus. Many seem to have a vitality of hope dwelling within that’s indescribable. They proclaim the good news about their new life through a program offering education and life skills. In fact, one announces that she wished she had electricity so she could read all night! Another reports walking for an hour to reach the project with the desire to become a nurse. In their poverty, they seem happy – hopeful, and they sing for us. I see Jesus in their faces. I hear Jesus through their singing. I feel that these young innocent girls are, indeed, the Easter people, and I claim them as sacred. They minister to me as if they know my soul needs reviving. How do they know? Do they realize that I carry their witness with me and call upon it daily? The resurrection story is manifested through their acts of love and kindness to strangers they had never met. The resurrection story comes alive when a smile is given and a hand grips mine. The resurrection story is present because they remind me that those of us who are wealthy have much to learn about humility and sacrifice.

This holy week gives us all an opportunity to reassess our lives and to re-claim our faith. We do have a loving God. The most spiritual among us is not exempt from the darkness yet we know that Jesus will not abandon us and walks with us in our journey. Jesus knows what it means to suffer and yet brings joy in the morning.

As Brian Wren wrote in 1978: “This is a day of new beginnings, time to remember and move on, time to believe what love is bringing, laying to rest the pain that’s gone. For by the life and death of Jesus, God’s mighty Spirit, now as then, can make for us a world of difference, as faith and hope are born again. Christ is alive, and goes before us to show and share what love can do. This is a day of new beginnings; our God is making all things new…Our God is making all things new.” Alleluia! Date: 4/12/2006