Entries Tagged as ''

“Gospel of Wealth” Facing Scrutiny

By ERIC GORSKI, AP Religion Writer                       Thu Dec 27, 2:56 PM ET   The message flickered into Cindy Fleenor’s living room each night: Be faithful in how you live and how you give, the television preachers said, and God will shower you with material riches. 

And so the 53-year-old accountant from the Tampa, Fla., area pledged $500 a year to Joyce Meyer, the evangelist whose frank talk about recovering from childhood sexual abuse was so inspirational. She wrote checks to flamboyant faith healer Benny Hinn and a local preacher-made-good, Paula White. Only the blessings didn’t come. Fleenor ended up borrowing money from friends and payday loan companies just to buy groceries. At first she believed the explanation given on television: Her faith wasn’t strong enough. 

“I wanted to believe God wanted to do something great with me like he was doing with them,” she said. “I’m angry and bitter about it. Right now, I don’t watch anyone on TV hardly.” All three of the groups Fleenor supported are among six major Christian television ministries under scrutiny by a senator who is asking questions about the evangelists’ lavish spending and possible abuses of their tax-exempt status. 

The probe by Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, has brought new scrutiny to the underlying belief that brings in millions of dollars and fills churches from Atlanta to Los Angeles — the “Gospel of Prosperity,” or the notion that God wants to bless the faithful with earthly riches. All six ministries under investigation preach the prosperity gospel to varying degrees. 

Proponents call it a biblically sound message of hope. Others say it is a distortion that makes evangelists rich and preys on the vulnerable. They say it has evolved from “it’s all right to make money” to it’s all right for the pastor to drive a Bentley, live in an oceanside home and travel by private jet. “More and more people are desperate and grasping at straws and want something that will alleviate their pain or financial crisis,” said Michael Palmer, dean of the divinity school at Regent University, founded by Pat Robertson. “It’s a growing problem.” 

The modern-day prosperity movement can largely be traced back to evangelist Oral Roberts‘ teachings. Roberts’ disciples have spread his theology and vocabulary (Roberts and other evangelists, such as Meyer, call their donors “partners.”) And several popular prosperity preachers, including some now under investigation, have served on the Oral Roberts University board. Grassley is asking the ministries for financial records on salaries, spending practices, private jets and other perks. The investigation, coupled with a financial scandal at ORU that forced out Roberts’ son and heir, Richard, has some wondering whether the prosperity gospel is facing a day of reckoning. 

While few expect the movement to disappear, the scrutiny could force greater financial transparency and oversight in a movement known for secrecy. Most scholars trace the origins of prosperity theology to E.W. Kenyon, an evangelical pastor from the first half of the 20th century. 

But it wasn’t until the postwar era — and a pair of evangelists from Tulsa, Okla. — that “health and wealth” theology became a fixture in Pentecostal and charismatic churches. Oral Roberts and Kenneth Hagin — and later, Kenneth Copeland — trained tens of thousands of evangelists with a message that resonated with an emerging middle class, said David Edwin Harrell Jr., a Roberts biographer. Copeland is among those now being investigated. 

“What Oral did was develop a theology that made it OK to prosper,” Harrell said. “He let Pentecostals be faithful to the old-time truths their grandparents embraced and be part of the modern world, where they could have good jobs and make money.” The teachings took on various names — “Name It and Claim It,” “Word of Faith,” the prosperity gospel. 

Prosperity preachers say that it isn’t all about money — that God’s blessings extend to health, relationships and being well-off enough to help others. They have Bible verses at the ready to make their case. One oft-cited verse, in Paul’s Second Epistle to the Corinthians, reads: “Yet for your sakes he became poor, that you by his poverty might become rich.” 

Critics acknowledge the idea that God wants to bless his followers has a Biblical basis, but say prosperity preachers take verses out of context. The prosperity crowd also fails to acknowledge Biblical accounts that show God doesn’t always reward faithful believers, Palmer said. The Book of Job is a case study in piety unrewarded, and a chapter in the Book of Hebrews includes a litany of believers who were tortured and martyred, Palmer said. 

Yet the prosperity gospel continues to draw crowds, particularly lower- and middle-income people who, critics say, have the greatest motivation and the most to lose. The prosperity message is spreading to black churches, attracting elderly people with disposable incomes, and reaching huge churches in Africa and other developing parts of the world. One of the teaching’s attractions is that it doesn’t dwell on traditional Christian themes of heaven and hell but on answering pressing concerns of the here and now, said Brian McLaren, a liberal evangelical author and pastor. 

But the prosperity gospel, McLaren said, not only preys on the hope of the vulnerable, it puts too much emphasis on individual success and happiness. “We’ve pretty much ignored what the Bible says about systemic injustice,” he said. 

The checks and balances central to Christian denominations are largely lacking in prosperity churches. One of the pastors in the Grassley probe, Bishop Eddie Long of suburban Atlanta, has written that God told him to get rid of the “ungodly governmental structure” of a deacon board. Some ministers hold up their own wealth as evidence that the teaching works. Atlanta-area pastor Creflo Dollar, who is fighting Grassley’s inquiry, owns a Rolls Royce and multimillion-dollar homes and travels in a church-owned Learjet. 

In a letter to Grassley, Dollar’s attorney calls the prosperity gospel a “deeply held religious belief” grounded in Scripture and therefore a protected religious freedom. Grassley has said his probe is not about theology. But even some prosperity gospel critics — like the Rev. Adam Hamilton of 15,000-member United Methodist Church of the Resurrection in suburban Kansas City, Mo. — say that the investigation is entering a minefield. 

“How do you determine how much money a minister like this is able to make when the basic theology is that wealth is OK?” said Hamilton, an Oral Roberts graduate who later left the charismatic movement. “That gets into theological questions.” There is evidence of change. Joyce Meyer Ministries, for one, enacted financial reforms in recent years, including making audited financial statements public. 

Meyer, who has promised to cooperate fully with Grassley, issued a statement emphasizing that a prosperity gospel “that solely equates blessing with financial gain is out of balance and could damage a person’s walk with God.” 

Ministers say they didn’t endorse Obama

Ministers say they didn’t endorse Obama  

By SEANNA ADCOX, Associated Press Writer             Wed Dec 26, 5:16 PM ET  

Two black South Carolina ministers listed by Barack Obama’s campaign as endorsing his White House bid say they did no such thing, and at least two others affirmed their support only after being contacted by campaign workers when questions were raised about their endorsements.  Earlier this month, Obama’s campaign released a list of what it said were nearly 130 senior pastors in South Carolina endorsing his run for the Democratic nomination. But when contacted by The Associated Press, several ministers said they have yet to decide who will get their vote and were unclear how they ended up on the Illinois senator’s list. “I really haven’t decided to endorse him yet. I was thinking about it,” said the Rev. Clifford Gaymon of Zion Hill Missionary Baptist Church in rural Clarendon County. 

An Obama spokeswoman said the list was created after campaign organizers called ministers and asked to release their names publicly. “We used all our resources to ensure we had the most accurate and up-to-date list, and we worked to check with everyone on the list,” said South Carolina spokeswoman Amaya Smith. “It’s a pretty long list of people.” But some ministers said their names were used without their permission. Gaymon, mistakenly listed as retired on the Obama list, said he’s been to campaign events to find out more about the Illinois senator, but did not receive a phone call about making an endorsement. The Rev. Michael Blue of Door of Hope Christian Church in Marion was added to the list without permission and has asked the Obama campaign to take his name off the list, said church spokesman Ronnie Green. 

Inaccuracies and murky tallies are not unique to the Obama campaign when in comes to touting the endorsements of black ministers in this early voting state — rival Hillary Rodham Clinton ran into some of the same questions after her campaign released its list of endorsements from black ministers late last month. Blacks comprise nearly half the Democratic primary vote in South Carolina, and the candidates are looking for an edge with the critical voting bloc. The majority of people endorsing each candidate was accurate, according to the AP reviews, and many supporters said they are eager to lend a hand. Both campaigns lists’ had some sloppy record keeping: misspelled names, churches listed in incorrect cities and beside incorrect names. But, like Clinton’s list, Obama has some other substantial inconsistencies. 

When Obama’s campaign released its list of ministers Dec. 4, it said everyone on it was a senior pastor, unless otherwise noted. That meant there were 122 senior pastors and three associate pastors of different churches and ministries, including four retirees.  

 

Before supplying a second list to the AP a day later, the campaign withdrew two names and added one, and noted a fourth associate pastor. The AP review found at least two more associate pastors and a youth pastor’s assistant.

Hannukah and Jesus

Hanukkah, the Festival of Lights, is celebrated for eight days, commencing on the 25th day of the month of Kislev (November/December), to commemorate the victory of the Jews over the Syrian Empire in 165 BCE.Following their victory, the Maccabees, sons of the Priestly Hasmonean family which led the Jews in their revolt against the Syrian overlords, entered the Holy Temple in Jerusalem defiled by the Syrian invaders, cleansed it and dedicated it anew to the service of God. Then, in memory of their victory, the Maccabees celebrated the first Hanukkah. (Hanukkah is the Hebrew term for “the dedication”).The Talmud, the body of Jewish oral law, relates how the Jewish heroes, led by Judah Maccabee, were making ready to rededicate the Temple and were unable to find enough undefiled oil to light the lamps. However, in one of the Temple chambers, they finally came upon a small cruse of oil which, under normal circumstances, would have lasted only one evening. Miraculously, this small amount of oil kept the Temple lights burning, not for one night, but for all the eight nights until new oil fit for use in the temple could be obtained. This is the miracle commemorated by the kindling of the Hanukkah lights.

 These events set the stage for the world that Jesus knew. The era of the Hasmonean revolt and the new Jewish monarchy which it created polarized the Jews in that time, and lighted their imagination. The Hasmonean dynasty was destroyed by King Herod, who ruled at the time of Jesus’ birth. He grew up at a time when this liberating dynasty has only just recently passed from the scope of history and many people remembered the former kings who had vanmighty empire to free the Jews. And this explains why the hopes were so high at the time of Jesus for another such annointed leader, a Messiah.

 With Hanukkah, we have, in a sense, the birth of Jesus before his birth - that event which set the stage for every thing that he knew and for the reaction of many people to his ministry.

The Gospel and Two Kinds of Lions

“The little boy of an African parable, who had played for long enough with a prettily and faithfully carved wooden lion-it might have been an excellent dogmatics! - was dreadfully frightened one day when he saw a real living and roaring lion approaching. If we have never seen the Gospel approaching as a real and living lion, we must not even imagine that we can ever point others to, or prepare them for, that astounding light, that two-edged sword, the decision which is forced on them or the unequivocal way in which it must be made. How can they be expected to take seriously what we ourselves have not taken serious or have done so only in the form of a lion which, however savagely it speaks and acts, is only carved out of wood? And if we have not taken it seriously, how can we be usable in the service of Jesus Christ?” - Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics IV/3.2, p. 660.

Resolution on Iraq

United Methodist Council of Bishops Resolution on the Iraq War  

Whereas, the Council of Bishops of the United Methodist Church, meeting Nov. 9 at Lake Junaluska, N.C., is committed to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world; and  Whereas, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace, calls his followers to be peacemakers (Matt. 5:9); and Whereas, “We believe war is incompatible with the teachings and example of Christ” (Book of Discipline 2004, Par. 165.C); and   Whereas, the cost of the war in Iraq as of Nov. 7, 2007 has been the lives of 3,843 members of the U.S. military, 171 members of the United Kingdom military, 132 members of the other Coalition military, 28,385 U.S. military wounded, and the lives of at least 76,241 Iraqi civilians; and Whereas the war in Iraq has displaced 2 million persons and forced another 2 million persons into refugee status; Whereas, every day the war continues more soldiers and innocent civilians are killed with no end in sight to the violence, bloodshed and carnage;   NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF BISHOPS calls on the President and Congress of the United States and the leaders of all the nations in the Coalition Forces:    

 

  • To begin immediately a safe and full withdrawal of all military personnel from Iraq, with no additional troops deployed;  
     

  • To declare that there will be no permanent military bases in Iraq;  
     

  • To increase support for veterans of the Iraq war and all wars;  
     

  • To initiate and give strong support to a plan for the reconstruction of Iraq, with high priority given to the humanitarian and social needs of the Iraqi people, such as healthcare, education and housing;   
     

FURTHER, THE COUNCIL OF BISHOPS calls United Methodist people throughout the world:    

 

  • To pray for peace and to have regular prayer vigils for congregations and communities;  
     

  • To care for all impacted by the war, including combatants and noncombatants by honoring the dead, healing the wounded and calling for the end of the war;  
     

  • To be peacemakers by word and deed that we may be called the children of God. 
      
       

     

Advent’s Hope

Today marks the first Sunday of Advent. Advent – which literally means “coming” - is a traditional season, celebrated by the Church to mark the nearness of Christmas, the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ, His coming into our world and our lives and our common space. The same tradition has offered a variety of themes which should be highlighted in the worship of local congregations for each and every Sunday of this season. The theme of the first Sunday in Advent is the theme of hope.

Oddly, this is not a theme for one Sunday out of 52 in the annual calendar of the Church’s worship. (But, for that matter, anything we single out on any Sunday is something that should be worshipped every hour of every day, so why take issue with this one theme among others?)

Hope is often confused with optimism. When politicians speak of hope, usually they are talking about optimism – a sort of foolish notion that good days are always ahead and that with a little spit and polish we can make it ok.

The biblical notion of hope – I find – runs deeper and darker. Hope is the affirmation that the world and all that is in it are in the hands of a force which is driving to a place and that this place is good. Christians have dubbed this place the Kingdom of God after the teachings of Jesus, but other religions share this same sense that the universe and it’s history and direction and natural order are headed somewhere. As Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. said when accepting his Nobel Prize:

When our days become dreary with low-hovering clouds of despair, and when our nights become darker than a thousand midnights, let us remember that there is a creative force in this universe, working to pull down the gigantic mountains of evil, a power that is able to make a way out of no way and transform dark yesterdays into bright tomorrows. Let us realize the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.”

The great difference between hope and optimism is that hope does not deny the dark side of reality. Our world is in pain and is far from perfection. It is broken. It bleeds. It cries. What is more, there will be more tears. More pain. More blood. And, in truth, try as we might to avert that, there may be little we can do. We may try to stop the pain of the world and – like Jesus on his Cross – end up throwing our bodies to a machine that will chew us up and spit us out from it’s teeth as nothing more than chum for the sharks. However, this does not mean that God will not be victorious in the end. I may be defeated. You may be defeated. But God cannot be defeated. That is hope! Hope is the assurance that “the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice” and that God is the guarantor of that arc’s direction and destination.