Entries Tagged as 'Gay Rights'

The Church’s Bedroom Eyes (A Rant)

This week, a book discussion at a Roman Catholic parish that was to be led by a lesbian Catholic and her father was canceled after objections from the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.

Carol Curoe of Minneapolis and Robert Curoe of Bernard, Iowa, were suppose to speak at St. Francis Cabrini Catholic Church about their book, “Are There Closets in Heaven? A Catholic Father and Lesbian Daughter Share Their Story.” However, after various conservatives contacted the archdiocese, spokesman Dennis McGrath contacted St. Francis Cabrini and St. Joan of Arc, the church where Carol Curoe, her partner and their children worship.

The talk went on at a different location: Spirit of the Lakes United Church of Christ in Minneapolis. McGrath said he advised St. Francis Cabrini that “it wasn’t a good idea” and that Archbishop Harry Flynn would not approve of a lesbian who is “in an actual full sexual relationship” speaking at a church.

He added: “We welcome gays and lesbians in the church, and there are many, I’m sure, who go to many of our parishes. But they have to follow the rules … they cannot be sexually active.”

Of course, this begs the obvious question: How do you know they are sexually active?!?! Does this couple need to get a restraining order on a church looking into their bedroom windows?

While one might object that this couple had children, since both women are, well, women, then there is no way this could have happened through sexual activities of any kind. While it might be argued that this couple has been seen kissing in public, this in itself is not an item to condemn, since all under this item half of Europe would be considered gay and lesbian. Of course, it is nothing that this couple lives together. Many same sex couple live together as room mates for economic convenience. If this were not so, nearly 100% of all college students would have to be classified as homosexual. Neither does it mean something that this couples’ children refer to them as their parents. Such designations are fluid in an era of mixed families.

This leaves only the couples own admission that they have sex. Still, this is hearsay, and if the church wants to prohibit this couple from entering the church and using the church grounds as if they were full members, then the church is going to need to come up with some hard and concrete evidence that this is a couple living in sin.

If the church is going to become a body with closed minds, closed hearts, and closed doors - then I want them to back up their bigotry and go the distance! Let’s see how far they are willing to back up their bigotry.

Gandhi once said that they key to his techniques was to draw out the lunacy of his opponents, to make them see what they were doing with their own eyes. If the British thought they were “compassionate”, then let them beat and murders thousands of people and tell the press about their “compassion”, and see if they still have the stomach for it.

I agree. Let the church stand in people’s bedrooms and take photos. Let it be done by the rectors, pastors and priests. If they think this is all about rules, and they thing everyone should follow the rules, then let THEM follow the rules. Back it up, or pack it up and stay quiet!

Phew! Thanks. I needed that.

Jersey Culture Wars

Not too long ago, the State of New Jersey legalized same-sex civil unions. Marriage and civil union are the legal domain of the state legislatures in the United States. And so, they had a right to do so, whatever the feelings of people on both sides of this issue. If you want your state to have same sex unions - call your state legislator. If you want your state to say that marriage is between one man and one woman - call your state legislator.

Ocean Grove, for those who do not know, was founded by the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association in 1869 as a Methodist summer seashore community. It is the longest-active camp meeting site in the United States.

When the State of New Jersey approved of civil unions, the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association ruled that no such unions were to be permitted on Camp Meeting property. The reason for this is that the position of the united Methodist Church states that no same-sex ceremonies are to performed by the clergy of the denomination and no such unions are to take place on church property.

Accordingly, the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association ruled that no ceremonies were to take place at the beach pavilion on the boardwalk at the end of Ocean Pathway, which the Camp Meeting Association considers a church that is exempt from the New Jersey’s anti-discrimination law.

 The decision to ban such ceremonies is the responsibility of Scott Rasmussen, President of the Camp Meeting Association. The board officially ratified his decision, so that the OGCMA could establish that the board had an unambiguous position and for future consultation.

A same-sex couple filed a civil rights complaint against the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association in 2007, claiming it discriminated against them by denying their request to hold a civil union ceremony in the Boardwalk Pavilion. The complaint is the first in New Jersey since same-sex civil unions were recognized there in 2007, said a spokesman for the state Division of Civil Rights.

An official of the Camp Meeting Association was quoted as saying that the association considers the pavilion to be as much of a religious building as the Tabernacle or the Youth Temple and that it would not permit same-sex civil union ceremonies to be conducted in the Pavilion, which it owns.

A local advocacy group, Ocean Grove United, disputed this, contending that the issue involves public, not religious, property. However, even their website acknowledges that the OGCMA “owns all of the property in Ocean Grove”. So, how they can claim that property owned by OGCMA is owned publicly (i.e., by the town of Neptune, the county, state, or federal government) is beyond me.

There is more at stake here than just one marriage. This is the first test to see if some claims made by certain people are in good faith or not.

Let me explain. Many church leaders have advocated for cultural pluralism and liberalization on the assumption that “I do it my way, you do it your way”. Personally, I have no problem with this. I support it. I do not want to the Church to run America - politically, culturally, or otherwise.

We have had allies in this measure by secular and left leaning friends for some time. But now comes the rub. What happens when the church says that Trenton can have same-sex unions, but we still won’t perform them or allow them performed on our property. Like it or not (and I don’t - for the record) the church has collectively agreed that the leaning of God in the dimensions is that gay marriage (or anything that looks like it with a different name) shall not be permitted by us in our communions and on our property.

So, now what? Will our former friends let us be or will they turn on us? The question is this: had the pluralism so many church leader supported never been the agenda of our allies? Have they all along not wanted pluralism, but secularism, even from us?

The possible end game here matters: Is it possible that the church being the church is illegal? This is one small case, but it could have big repercussions. It is already not allowed for chaplains in the military to say that their religion (whatever it is) is better than another’s. So, is it conceivable that there will come a day when the churches in the US are shut down by the government because preaching that Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life is offensive to people who are Jewish, Muslim, etc.?

I think this is the crux of the issue here. Same-sex unions is only the window dressing. This is an issue about what rights, obligations, and privileges the Church has in the face of an ideology of equality by most Americans which can no longer see that their pluralistic-secularism has in some places become a dogmatism just as rigid as the religious people they make fun of.

Think on this . . . .

Only Adam and Eve?

The following article appeared in the Columbus Dispatch. It is a nice article relating to the difficult of the churches to find their voice on this important social, political, and very pastoral problem.
   

Only Adam and Eve?
Homosexuality has become a defining issue for churches
Wednesday,  June 20, 2007 3:41 AM

THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH  

Homosexuality is wrong. The Bible says so. Leviticus 18:22.  You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; such a thing is an abomination.

But wait. What about Galatians 3:28?

There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Such is the riddle for organized religion: Can churches keep true to the faith while accepting sexually active gay men and women into their fold?

The issue of homosexuality and churches’ stands on it is raging across the country. A report released yesterday by the United Methodist Church shows how divisive the debate can be.

Slightly more than half of the clergy and lay members surveyed agreed with the church’s position: It does not condone homosexuality and believes it is against Christian teaching. Thirty percent of clergy members and 28 percent of laity members strongly disagreed with the church’s stance.

The views varied greatly in different parts of the country. In the West, 58 percent of clergy members and 53 percent of laypeople strongly disagreed with the church’s view; in the Southeast, the figures were 17 percent and 18 percent, respectively.

The United Methodist church also urges its members not to reject or condemn gay members or friends. Most clergy members and laypeople agreed with that position in the survey.

Nowhere is the debate hotter than among the world Anglican Communion and its brothers and sisters in the U.S. Episcopal Church.

In February, Anglican leaders warned U.S. Episcopalians about blessing same-sex unions and installing gay bishops. The whole matter might come to a head in September at a meeting of the bishops in New Orleans. The archbishop of Canterbury, head of the Anglican Communion, is expected to attend.

Other denominations are watching.

“People certainly recognize that what happens within the Anglican community will be held up either as an example of overcoming your differences or what can happen when you divide,” said Dr. James Childs, a professor of theology and ethics at Trinity Lutheran Seminary in Bexley.

“People see the debate and wonder, ‘Is this a world unraveling? Is this a disruption of the natural order? If we affirm this in the church, are we moving toward chaos?’ The answers remain to be seen.”

The governing body of his own denomination, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, is not immune. A February announcement that a popular gay minister at Atlanta’s oldest Lutheran church was being removed because he has a partner has renewed discussion about gay clergy members.

The matter is unresolved and is expected to be a focus of a meeting of the Lutherans in August.

The notion that the issue is escalating for many denominations, and that it may lead to unprecedented fracturing of churches, is well-founded, conservative Christians say.

“Individual Christians, Christian families, organizations and entire denominations must decide whether to affirm God’s word or not,” said Melissa Fryrear, director of gender issues for Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian organization.

“The Bible is clear on sexual behavior: It is between one man and one woman, only in marriage. There is no middle ground, and there are no loopholes.”

Christian conservatives and evangelicals say that Scripture is clear, so there should be no debate. Yet it rages on in churches because it is being discussed at home.

Such controversy is hardly new, said Susan Henking, a professor of religion and social sciences at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, a 2,000-student combined liberal-arts campus in Geneva, N.Y. She specializes in, and has written books and papers on, religion and sexuality.

The current debate over homosexuality and the church is rooted in a society that used to discuss morality only in private, Henking said.

“What we’re really fighting over is, ‘What is the role of religion in the public sphere?’ ” she said.

History tells us, she said, that the most divisive religious fights come during times of shifting boundaries.

“That’s what we have here. We are debating what the role of religion will play in shaping the minds of the secular world and our whole culture. As goes the church, so goes society.”

And that’s exactly what Aly Rivero is afraid of.

Rivero struggled for years to put her internal battles into perspective. Then, in April, she read a newspaper article about a lesbian couple denied communion at their Roman Catholic church in Wyoming, and it all became clear.

One of the women said she spends half her life defending her Catholicism to gays, and the other half defending her gayness to Catholics.

“That was a perfect description,” Rivero said. “People underestimate my personal struggle and the toll it takes.”

Rivero is of Cuban descent; her parents came to the United States in the 1950s. She is a lifelong Catholic. She attended Catholic school and earned her undergraduate degree at a Christian college.

“You can’t erase those teachings,” she said. “But I know who I am, and my God is a loving God, an accepting God. I just wish my family and I could worship the way we want.”

They cannot.

She and her partner of four years, Joy Livergood, live in a comfortably decorated split-level home in a middle-class Reynoldsburg neighborhood. Rivero is a speech/language pathologist; Livergood is a 21-year active-duty and reserve Navy veteran working on her doctorate at Ohio State University. The two met online in 2003 when they lived in Florida.

Rivero and Livergood are raising two children together: Livergood’s 13-year-old daughter and Joseph Rivero-Livergood, who is almost 1.

After Rivero was artificially inseminated, the couple paid a lawyer $3,500 to draw up documents giving each woman equal standing as a parent.

“We are committed and faithful,” Rivero said. “Surely that means something.”

Once established in Franklin County, she says they met with the priest at St. Pius X in Reynoldsburg. The church wasn’t interested in their membership unless they abstained, she said. They refused.

The Rev. Dan Ochs, St. Pius pastor, did not return calls seeking comment. But the discussion as Rivero relates it is consistent with the teachings of the church, said Robin Miller, spokeswoman for the Columbus Diocese.

Church law says that homosexual tendencies are not a sin, but practicing homosexuality is immoral.

Gays, she said, “are to be accepted with compassion, respect and sensitivity … but are called to live lives of chastity.”

Rivero and Livergood are welcome to attend Mass and worship at church, Miller said, but if they are having sex they cannot accept the church sacraments.

Livergood said she last took Holy Communion in 2002. Rivero cannot remember when she last partook.

“We consider ourselves to be spiritual, not religious,” Livergood said. “We think that way because the Catholic Church let us down.”

The Rev. F. Allan Debelak counts himself among those who don’t believe homosexuality will divide churches beyond repair. His East Side church stands as an example, he said.

The congregation of Redeemer Lutheran Church, after months of meetings with more than 90 church regulars and community residents in attendance, voted in 1992 to become a “reconciling in Christ” church.

That means the church accepts everyone, including gays. Debelak also performs what he calls “same-sex covenant ceremonies,” to recognize a couple’s commitment.

The church lost just two or three members after the vote, he said. He estimates about 10 percent of the congregation, which averages about 170 members at Sunday services, is gay.

Debelak acknowledges, however, that he has lost some credibility within the Lutheran synod.

“I’ve become a one-issue pastor in the eyes of some folk,” he said. “And that’s untrue, unfortunate and unfair.”

He counts the Bible’s book of Acts as evidence that his path is the right one. In Acts 8:38, Philip baptizes a eunuch.

“Philip shouldn’t have been doing that. But he did. And I don’t think these are fairy tales. I think they show an unfolding of the church, a progression. I hope that’s where we are today.”

Slapback Brownback

Still a Putz

GOP Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas is slowly but surely shaping up to be my least favorite candidate for the White House. I am starting to love to hate him.

He apologized this week to Mitt Romney and two top leaders of the Mormon Church after one of his staffers used her personal e-mail to circulate anti-Mormon materials. This of course was a mistake and not intended in any way. (Right! And Rove never meant to leak that Plame information, too.) The staffer was not fired, but she was severely reprimanded (with a wink and nod, no doubt).

The list forwarded by Brownback’s southeast Iowa field director to a dozen activists asked about the validity of several items, including “the only thing Christianity and the LDS Church has in common is the name of Jesus Christ, and the LDS Jesus is not the same Jesus of the Christian faith.” 

The staffer’s e-mail was naturally seen as an affront to fellow Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney, whose Mormon religion is his biggest obstacle for the 2008 nomination and election. Brownback personally apologized to Romney on Monday. 

Man, I just love a candiate who campaigns as a religious conservative and who takes time to knock followers of Jesus Christ.  He wants to rebuild and strengthen American families, but apparently the uber-family focused Mormons cannot be trusted in this. He wants to protect life, but the prochoice Mormon Christians need not apply. He believed in religious liberty being restored to Christians, but not to all who confess Jesus as Lord and Savior. This guys believes in just about everything the Mormons believe regarding our American public square, but he does not like the people who confess the same Savior and advocate the same policies enough to accept them.

Seriously, who can vote for this guy?! Do we really need a president who would spent his days in the White House gnawing off his own feet?

My only hope is that he stays in the election long enough to give me pleasure for some time to come.

Cohabitating with Special Privileges

Here is a quick thought about the churches and homosexuality. It is something that people who oppose the present teaching by churches on homosexuality and those who support it can both agree on.

 

Why is it that churches feel a need to work so tirelessly against homosexuals and “their agenda”, while at the same time welcoming couples who are unmarried and live together into their congregations and making no mention of it.

 

The reason I compare these two is because – according to an important factor of church dogma – they are the exact same thing. Sex out of wedlock is the issue in both cases.

 

Gay couples are “living in sin” in part because they are engaging in intimate relations with one another and doing so outside the bounds of holy matrimony. But the same can be said about the preponderance of couples in modern society who live together and who are not married. I would say that almost a quarter of the young couples I marry these days have children together before they get to the altar. So, there is no way that they are cohabitating chastely.

 

There are only three solutions to this mess, as I see it, and all require a greater degree of consistency on the part of the church and it’s witness to the world.

 

First, admit that cohabitation is not a sin and so homosexuality (or at least the cohabitation argument) is not a sin either.

 

Second, admit that homosexuality as cohabitation is a sin and so is all the other cohabitation going on. Kick the straight couples out church, refuse to marry them, preach against them, and require more discipline among the elect of God.

 

Third, admit that they are the same thing – bad, but not the end of the world. Most preachers and churches do not condone cohabitation, but they spend very little time fighting it. After all, there are two wars going on, the rich are getting richer at the expense of the rest of us, we have a lawless president in the White House, two parties who like to complain but do nothing about it, an education system that does not correlate to our wealth, abusive relationships, child molestation, widespread meaninglessness and hopelessness, and so much more. Perhaps as a church there are more important things we can worry about. We’ll get to this other stuff when we are ready to take a breath.

 

 

Traveling Towards an Open Heaven

By Savi Hensman - posted on ekklesia.co.uk at this site here.
9 May 2007
From the outside it is easy to conclude that the main division between those rather easily pigeonholed ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’ in the Anglican Communion, as in other branches of the Christian faith, revolves around matters of sexual ethics. In reality the arguments are more foundational, though what they have in common is attempts to wrestle decisive meaning from biblical texts which are rich, varied and complex.So, one of the reasons given by certain Episcopal churches for breaking away from the denomination in the USA is that “The Episcopal Church has departed from the authority of the Holy Scriptures and from historic Christian teaching on the uniqueness of Jesus Christ as the only Lord and Saviour of humankind.” In other word, whether Christians alone can be saved (restored from captivity to death and granted fullness of life by God) remains a hotly debated question in some churches.  

The Presiding Bishop in The Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, has been condemned by some for her view that, while for Christians “our route to God is through Jesus”, people of other beliefs approach God through their own cultural contexts and “experience God in human relationships, as well as ones that transcend human relationships”. It is claimed that this contradicts the position that, in the Johannine account of Jesus’ words, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14.6).

Elsewhere too – especially in South Asia, where respect for other religions is fundamental to many Christians – numerous Anglicans risk being condemned as heretical for supposedly straying from biblical orthodoxy.

However some New Testament writers appear to take the view that being a Christian is not necessary for salvation. According to the Beatitudes, for instance, mercy will be shown to the merciful, to the poor, to those who mourn, and to peacemakers – who will be called children of God (Matthew 5.1-12). Later in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus is quoted as saying that “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven”, while many who believe that they have done great works in Jesus’ name will be condemned as evildoers (Matthew 7.21-23).

It is debatable whether any will be ultimately lost, or whether the ‘refiner’s fire’ (Malachi 3.2-3, Isaiah 48.10), when humans are painfully stripped of their illusions and brought face to face with the truth, can melt even hearts of stone. In any case, Matthew’s gospel appears to value reflection of God’s generous love over ideology of any kind. “If you forgive others their trespasses,” Jesus’ listeners are told, “your heavenly Father will also forgive you” (Matthew 6.14).

In the famous parable of the sheep and goats, it is not those with pious words on their lips but those who have fed the hungry, welcomed the alien, cared for the sick and visited the imprisoned who are invited to possess the kingdom, to their considerable surprise (Matthew 25.31-46). What they have done for the lowliest on earth they have done for the king, both ‘Son of Man’ – embodying what humanity can, should and will be – and ‘Son of the Father’.

In John’s gospel, too, Jesus of Nazareth, born at a particular historical moment and into a particular cultural setting – is identified with one who transcends space and time, the universal Christ. According to John, in the beginning is the Word (divine reason), without whom nothing is made, in whom is the life which enlightens everyone. It is this way, life and truth which is enfleshed in Jesus and which reveals the true heart of God (a contextual reading of John 14.6). Those who oppose his works of mercy and liberation, though they may think they are championing obedience to the literal words of God, are rejecting this truth.

In this way, the world’s (and religion’s) expectations are turned upside down: the Almighty stoops to wash feet and is executed for blasphemy and sedition.

While the exact mechanisms of redemption remain open to debate, the crucifixion and resurrection of one in whom humanity and divinity are in perfect concurrence is presented as the pivotal event in history. Salvation is offered, not from the vengeance of an authoritarian deity but from the personal and social consequences of failure to love. People and communities need no longer be trapped by hatred and fear, pursuit of wealth, power and all that does not, in the end, satisfy; death no more reigns.

It might appear that, while following Jesus is the way to salvation, there may be other ways of relating to Christ, whether recognised and named or not. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God in them (1 John 4.16). God will not force people to choose the way of love and truth, but those who are open can be transformed and play their part in God’s transformation of a world wracked by division and pain into a realm of love and peace.

This is not a mere liberal embracing of all faiths. In examining any tradition, it may be worth asking whether it leads to good news or bad for the poor and downtrodden, whether its followers are supported in becoming more Christ-like or encouraged to devalue and mistreat their neighbour. In Luke’s gospel, when Jesus faces hostility from the pious, he proclaims that Wisdom is justified by all her children (Luke 7.35, see also Matthew 11.19). He often draws on the legacy of Wisdom, whom some identify with the Spirit: present from the dawn of creation, those who search for her find her, and her path is the path of justice (Proverbs 3.19-20, 8.17, 20).

Superficial judgement is not enough: faith communities may be divided between the wise and unwise, those who cultivate understanding and compassion and those who spurn them. “The wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere,” writes James in his epistle (letter). “And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace” (James 3.17-18).

There are indeed New Testament passages which might be read as indicating that it is only Christians (or indeed some Christians) who will be granted God’s mercy and life. But readers of the Gospels need not struggle to understand why a God held up as a model of generosity by, and embodied in, Jesus would condemn people who, faced with a host of competing belief systems, have picked the wrong one, especially since some will have been put off by misdeeds committed in the name of Christ. God is indeed loving and kind.

The Bible is complex, and those reading it will often draw different conclusions. However those who believe that it is evident from Scripture that non-Christians will be condemned are making unfounded assumptions. Indeed, as Christians, we are at risk of constructing images of God which lead us to dangerous judgementalism towards our neighbour and complacency in our own lives (Matthew 7). It is only by seeking and serving Christ in others, and opening ourselves to grow towards the One in whom humanity is fulfilled and divinity incarnate, that we can be freed and made whole.

Savi Hensman was born in Sri Lanka. She works in the voluntary sector in London. She is an Ekklesia associate.

South Hill UMC’s New Member

Rev. Barry Burkholder has finally - after two years - accepted the transfer of an openly gay person to the South Hill United Methodist Church in Virginia.

Said gentleman (his name is not known) applied for membership in 2005 after having worshipped there for a while, joined the choir and participated in other fellowship. When he asked to join the church, he was denied because he was gay. This decision was appealed to the bishop and annual conference. All told the then-pastor Edward H. Johnson to accept the man if he was willing to take the various oaths required for membership. Johnson then appealed these ruling all the way to the United Methodist Church’s version of the Supreme Court, called “The Judicial Council”. Much to everyone’s surprise, Johnson won. The Judicial Council ruled that a pastor, as the head of the congregation, had the right to accept or reject any membership application she or he may see fit. This ruling caused something of a fire-storm in the United Methodist Church, primarily among the bishops, clergy and lay leadership. While the UMC bars “open and practicing homosexuals” from becoming clergy or being appointed to churches, it has never made any such restriction for membership. In fact, the UMC has always had a very open and welcoming membership policy. For my own part, I believe that there were two miscarriages of justice in that case. The first is that a United Methodist minister was permitted to reject a man from membership to the church in spite of the fact that he could make every necessary vow. He was able to confess Jesus Christ as his savior, put is trust in His grace, and offer his loyalty to the universal church and the United Methodist Church. These have always been our criteria. We ask that everyone admit that they are a sinner before God and that they are working on their sin. We do not ask that a person delineate each and every sin, and that they even agree to what are sins and what are not. Methodists have always opposed gambling. I would be turning away many good Christian souls at the door if I rejected for membership every person who went to Atlantic City once in a while and thought there was nothing wrong with that. For that matter, I’d turn even more away if I rejected everyone who like a beer with a steak once in a while. We do not demand perfection. We demand a willingness to work on perfection.

The second miscarriage of justice was that the person was denied for being a person who our own theology claims is “a person of sacred worth” even in and as a practicing homosexual. The pastor thought that the theology of the church was not strict enough, rejected it in violation of his covenantal obligation to uphold the church’s teaching, and then claimed that a “person of sacred worth” is not worthy enough to be a self-professed disciple of Jesus Christ in communion with other such disciples.

That is mind boggling!
 

I offer a big and warm welcome to my new brother in Christ and within the connection of the United Methodist Church, whoever you are. In fact, I applaud you for sticking with it when you could have left, gone down the street, and found another church. Your commitment has made us better Christians.

New Pastor Accepts Gay Member

Posted by North West Arkansas Online’s Morning News. Click here.

SOUTH HILL, Va. — The new pastor at a Methodist church that had barred a gay man from membership two years ago has reversed that decision and allowed the man to join.

The Rev. Barry Burkholder, the new leader of South Hill United Methodist Church, told the congregation to accept the man’s transfer from a Baptist church. The denomination has not released the name of the gay congregant.

The former pastor, the Rev. Edward H. Johnson, said in 2005 that he could not accept the man as a member because he would neither repent nor seek to change. Johnson has since been appointed pastor at another Virginia church, Dahlgren United Methodist Church.

The case led to a showdown in church courts between Johnson and the denomination’s Virginia Conference, which oversees congregations and pastors in the region.

The conference tried to bar Johnson from ministry for a year for his decision.

The Methodist Book of Discipline declares gay relationships “incompatible with Christian teaching,” and bars sexually active gays from ordination. However, the denomination has no rules on church membership for openly gay congregants. The mainline Protestant denomination advertises itself as an open and welcoming church.

Johnson appealed his punishment to the highest church court — the Judicial Council — and won. The high court concluded that pastors have the authority to decide who becomes a member of a local church and ordered Johnson reinstated to ministry.

Burkholder told United Methodist News Service last week that the gay man professed that Christ was his savior and that Jesus died for his sins, so he was ready to become a member of the church.

NOTE FROM ANDREW: The sixth paragraph “Methodist Book of Discipline” should read “United Methodist”, that being the actual name of the denomination.

Pro-Gay Rights Religious Billboard Vandalized

by 365Gay.com Newscenter StaffPosted: April 26, 2007 - 11:00 am ET  in this place.

(Indianapolis, Indiana) Church leaders sponsoring a pro-gay religious billboard campaign in Indianapolis say they will not be deterred after several of the huge signs were painted out.

One of the billboards was completely obliterated with black spray paint.  Another had the words “lie, lie, lie,” spray painted in red.

The campaign is being coordinated by Jesus Metropolitan Community Church of Indianapolis, with support from Faith In America and Metropolitan Community Churches worldwide.  Faith In America is a national organization devoted to ending the injustice of religion-based bigotry against gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people.

Twenty-two billboards featuring pro-gay Biblical messages were put up throughout Indianapolis. The campaign which began earlier this month (story) is to last 30 days.

One billboard proclaims “David loved Jonathan More than women. II Samuel 1:26″ another says “Jesus affirmed a gay couple.  Matthew 8:5-13.” Yet another says “Ruth loved Naomi as Adam loved Eve. Genesis 2:24; Ruth 1:14.”

Police said that to deface the signs the vandals would have needed an extension ladder. A police department spokesperson said that it would be hard to find the culprits, unless they were caught in the act.

Police stations throughout the city have been told to be on the lookout for suspicious activity around the other billboards.

Jesus MCC also has distributed about 2,000 yard signs around the city. Many of them have been pulled out of the ground in front of LGBT supporters homes.

“There was a sense of disappointment, a sense of shock, the church’s pastor, Rev. Jeff Miner, told WRTV.

Milner said he hopes a community sense of outrage helps spur debate. 

“We’re going to share a positive, powerful message how the Bible affirms gay people and we know there is going to be some opposition as we try to get that message out here,” he said.

No one has claimed responsibility for the vandalism.

The Indiana Family Institute which has been pressing for a constitutional amendment to bar same-sex marriage denounced the vandalism but also criticized the billboards messages.

“I think homosexuals are noted in the Bible in a couple of key passages that were an example of sexual sin that is decried by God,” said spokesperson Curt Smith.

Earlier this month a proposed amendment banning same-sex marriage and likely barring any benefits for unmarried couples - same, or opposite-sex - died in a committee at the legislature.

The Anti-Christ comes to Blacksburg, VA

Deep in the dark recesses of the Christian community lurks a demonic little group led by a man named Fred Phelps. Phelps has for years been engaged in what he believes is a moral crusade against the United States and it’s fall from some perceived ethical standard of long ago. He believes that the Unites States has fallen from grace by tolerating homosexuals and we are being punished by God for our sins. He blames gays for the destruction of the Challenger, 9/11, the War in Iraq, and – most recently – the shootings at Virginia Tech. He sometimes refers to gays and lesbians as “these beasts”. He claims the Fire Fighters who died at the World Trade Center and Mr. Rogers are in Hell (not joking!).

And just in case you are not sure that Phelps is serious about blamingGo to fullsize image homosexual persons for all the evils in the world, just check out his website. It is poetically enough called www.godhatesfags.com.  Yup, you read that right. For a hoot, check out the companion sight set up by Phelps in opposition to the lenient laws of Sweden www.godhatessweden.com (Again, not a joke!) Oh yes, Fred Phelps also hates Ronald Reagan, Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, NFL star Reggie White, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Jews, Catholics, Scandinavians, and the Irish. Lastly, he claims Al Gore is a “famous fag pimp”. I guess those websites are still pending.

One of Fred Phelps’ more – shall we say – endearing qualities is that he likes to picket funerals. He picketed the funeral of Matthew Shepherd, the young man who was brutally assaulted in Laramie, Wyoming and strung up on a fence facing a road for all to see. He ultimately died after a few days from a fracture that ran from the back of his head to the front of his right ear. 22 year old Shepherd was gay and his attacker admitted this was the reason they attacked and killed the boy.

Every major church – even the most conservative in the America – condemned the attack as brutal, monstrous and opposed to the best values that God commands for each and every one of us. Every one. Even the churches that condemn homosexuality says that – while Shepherd was a sinner – what those two men did to him was worse.Everyone except Fred Phelps, who showed up with a brigade to picket the funeral of Shepherd and denounce any public outcry for the execution of a gay man.

Phelps has in recent years taken to picketing the funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq. He believed that Saddam Hussein was the only Muslim leader in the Middle East who allowed the Gospel to be preached and supported him. He believes that 9/11 was God’s condemnation of America for being tolerant to gays and lesbians, and he believes that the present troubles in Iraq are the direct result of God’s displeasure. 

Just this week he announced he would be picketing the funerals for the victims of Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech mass murderer. Not to fear. Fred is not losing his edge. He believes that Cho is in Hell too, but he believes that Cho “was also fulfilling the word of God.” Apparently, we all needed a wake up call to realize just how mad God was. 

A great theologian once wrote that Christians do not need to contend with non-believers for the conversion of the world. We need to contend with other Christians who are – more often than not – the best argument against Jesus Christ. The Bible says that anyone who stands against the Gospel of Jesus Christ is effectively anti-Christ (2 Thessalonians 2:1-4). Rev. Phelps, I say this in all sincerity and biblical faithfulness: you are the Antichrist, dear sir.

Fred, the best I can pray for you is that one day, when you are cast into the “outer darkness where there is great weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matt. 22:13-14), you will look around and not find a single Irishman, Swede or homosexual. Perhaps then, as you have a moment to pause because Lucifer gags briefly before swallowing you down, you will realize just how horribly, deeply, and truly you have betrayed the Lord and God you once hoped to serve. 

And for that dreadful day I would say, “God be with you” but I know there are some places even He will not go. May it be so, Amen.