Entries Tagged as 'Politics'

Dobson Dissents

Dobson Squarepants

Last week, Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, writing his personal views in an online commentary, WorldNetDaily, declared he will not vote for former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani in a presidential election.

“Many liberal Americans will agree with the social positions espoused by Giuliani. However, I don’t believe conservative voters whose support he seeks will be impressed,” Dobson wrote on WorldNetDaily. “I will either cast my ballot for an also-ran — or if worse comes to worst — not vote in a presidential election for the first time in my adult life.”

This adds a second “will not support” to the front runners in the GOP race. He earlier said he would not support John McCain.

My only question is this: Why does Dobson not consider voting for a Democrat when he does not know who they will run? Why does he refuse to even consider this possibility, writing off an entire slew of candidates without consideration or public declaration? Who would take voting advice from a guy who knows in advance who he will support and who he wont?

If I am looking to become an informed voter, to help me along in a decision which is important, I would not go to someone who refuses to think about the things he does not think about. I’d rather hear what is said by someone who considers every possibility. This is like asking an ant-eater what they think of cabbage and being surprised they either never thought of it or they prefer ants.

If you want voting advice, ask a news junky who actively seeks a good candidate every election and does not vote the same party all the time.

Deflagging the Church

Last Friday, Rev. Clayton Childers, of the Washington-based United Methodist Board of Church and Society, was quoted by the press sayign, “The presence of a national flag in worship can imply endorsement of national policies which often run counter to the teachings of Jesus Christ and our Christian faith. … One need only recall the way the swastika flag was displayed prominently in German churches during the Nazi era.”

He wrote: “I do not believe in blind loyalty. I cannot affirm the idea of ‘my country, right or wrong.’ There are times when the United States has been very wrong in its actions, even outrageously wrong, and until we are able to own the hard truth of our failures, dare we say ’sins,’ we will never be able to experience the full and abundant life God would have for us as a people and as one member in the world community of nations.”

Let me start my saying that we need a national moratorium on saying something is like the Nazi this or that almost as much as we need a moratorium on the death penalty. Come on, Clay. That only hurts your case. The American flag is no more like the swastika than the flag of Slovenia.

Be that as it may, I have long had sympathy for Childers’ position. The Church is not an American institution. In the eyes of God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, the United States is just another in a long line of nations which will eventually pass away into dust. It is better than many, but lacks the goodness of some. (After all, the Chinese have better food, and the Indians have a deeper public religious life. Neither do we get to wear togas.)

There is place for celebrating nation in the Church. We should be thankful for what we have. If it is right for me to be thankful that I have a job, or money in my account, it is no less right to be thankful for a nation which - all things being eqaul - if I had had a choice I would have chosen without hesitation.

But the concern for nation worship is well met. I asked folks in my church to wear red for this up coming Sunday. When I asked if they remember why, most replied that next weekend was Memorial Day. When I mentioned, no, it was Pentecost, I got blank stares.

Many might call it liberal radicalism, but there is a dangerous convergeance of God and America which is not very healthy for the spiritual life of Christians. America is great. I love this country. My father left Europe and ran here simply because America was a great as it is. I would even say we are blessed by God. The invention of baseball is a clear sign of divine favor.

But when at Sunday worship, the celebration and ritual of the nation surplants the life of the people of God, we have a problem. Anyone who has pastored a church on Fourth of July weekend knows exactly what I am talking about. It is very hard to keep a church a church on the fourth.

Perhaps, for the sake of the church, we should take out the flags, pledges, memorial day prayers, and all the rest of it. Perhaps we should just take a few years to be Church, and only Church. Perhaps it would do us all well to say, “Memorial, what?” So that the celebration of God’s glorious and comforting presence in the Spirit is not surpassed by remembering people who gave their lives for a nation of ashes and dust that shall return to ashes and dust.

Clay and I disagree about the similarity of the stars and stripes and swastikas. But, I agree with him that flags and other signs of patriotism is confusing in a church. And I mean, “in a church”. They are fine outside. But within, the are too close to the altar for people to make the necessary separation.

Advice for Mitt

I have been asked more than a few times, as a pastor in a liberal church with evangelical pretenses, my opinion of Mitt Romney and his “Mormonism”.

            Well, I have thought a little about this and I have come to one conclusion. Gov. Romney should join the Democrat Party.

            Here are some of my thoughts:

1.   Most people in America do not know the first thing about Mormonism. This works both against Romney in conservative circles and for him in liberal ones. 

   It works against him among staunch Christians whom he needs to win over just to get a chance at the big chair in November ‘08. Most practicing, reasonable knowledgeable Christians still know little or nothing about Mormonism. What they do know is that they are “not like us”, “don’t believe what we believe”, “pervert the faith”, and so on. Without knowing about Mormonism, most Christians think it’s creepy at best.

   As for liberals of a more secular nature, most probably think a Mormon is an immigrant The Republic of Mormonia, somewhere near the Balkans. Those who actually know a Mormon is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Later Day Saints, probably think that outfit is no more or less evil than any other brand of Christian. At best it is a gain for him, and worse it effects him not at all. I can only believe that this is how Senate Dem leader Harry Reid slipped by.

2. Being different has not often been a boon in Republican circles. Just ask Steve Forbes, Barry Goldwater, or that Kermit the Frog wannabe Gary Baur. No, the more normal, defined, and “like-the-rest-o-‘em” you are, the better.   Lots of liberals, on the other hand, love to show off the minority in the family. Having someone a little different around just shows the other ladies at the cocktail party how truly liberal and inclusive you really are while you sip your gin and juice. Having a devout Mormon and Republican who once argued for civil unions, gun control, and immigration reform at the head of a Democrat tickets would make us feel so bloody superior we would run in droves to vote for him.

3. Republicans have a tendency to get bored when people start speaking about being oppressed, or victimized, or marginalized in anyway. After all, no master likes to hear what the slaves say in the pantry all by themselves. Republicans do not care what oppressed group Jesse Jackson has had a heretofore unacknowledged lifetime interest in this week. The Republican motto has always been: “Suck it up and act like a man.” Even if you are a woman.   Democrats on the other hand love marginalized people. Blacks, women, Latinos, GLBTs, you name it. The Democrats love you and want to work for you. Well, what about the most select and never before represented group in history: multi-millionaire straight white fundamentalist men religiously persecuted as atheists by liberal Black preachers. Man, that’s so twisted and mean, no one even thought it up until “Diamond Al” came along. Mitt, only the Dems can truly know your pain.

4.  But the best reason to join the Democrats is the simplest. Republicans don’t believe in God but like to talk about nothing other than God while using their pseudo faith to beat down whoever they don’t like this week. Democrats actually go to church but do not like to bring their faith into the voting booth. Romney has been asking people to do just that. Acknowledge him as a person of faith and know that he is not the same as his church when he’s in a governor’s mansion or, maybe one day, the oval office. Mitt, I’ll see you in Denver next August!

Traveling Towards an Open Heaven

By Savi Hensman - posted on ekklesia.co.uk at this site here.
9 May 2007
From the outside it is easy to conclude that the main division between those rather easily pigeonholed ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’ in the Anglican Communion, as in other branches of the Christian faith, revolves around matters of sexual ethics. In reality the arguments are more foundational, though what they have in common is attempts to wrestle decisive meaning from biblical texts which are rich, varied and complex.So, one of the reasons given by certain Episcopal churches for breaking away from the denomination in the USA is that “The Episcopal Church has departed from the authority of the Holy Scriptures and from historic Christian teaching on the uniqueness of Jesus Christ as the only Lord and Saviour of humankind.” In other word, whether Christians alone can be saved (restored from captivity to death and granted fullness of life by God) remains a hotly debated question in some churches.  

The Presiding Bishop in The Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, has been condemned by some for her view that, while for Christians “our route to God is through Jesus”, people of other beliefs approach God through their own cultural contexts and “experience God in human relationships, as well as ones that transcend human relationships”. It is claimed that this contradicts the position that, in the Johannine account of Jesus’ words, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14.6).

Elsewhere too – especially in South Asia, where respect for other religions is fundamental to many Christians – numerous Anglicans risk being condemned as heretical for supposedly straying from biblical orthodoxy.

However some New Testament writers appear to take the view that being a Christian is not necessary for salvation. According to the Beatitudes, for instance, mercy will be shown to the merciful, to the poor, to those who mourn, and to peacemakers – who will be called children of God (Matthew 5.1-12). Later in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus is quoted as saying that “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven”, while many who believe that they have done great works in Jesus’ name will be condemned as evildoers (Matthew 7.21-23).

It is debatable whether any will be ultimately lost, or whether the ‘refiner’s fire’ (Malachi 3.2-3, Isaiah 48.10), when humans are painfully stripped of their illusions and brought face to face with the truth, can melt even hearts of stone. In any case, Matthew’s gospel appears to value reflection of God’s generous love over ideology of any kind. “If you forgive others their trespasses,” Jesus’ listeners are told, “your heavenly Father will also forgive you” (Matthew 6.14).

In the famous parable of the sheep and goats, it is not those with pious words on their lips but those who have fed the hungry, welcomed the alien, cared for the sick and visited the imprisoned who are invited to possess the kingdom, to their considerable surprise (Matthew 25.31-46). What they have done for the lowliest on earth they have done for the king, both ‘Son of Man’ – embodying what humanity can, should and will be – and ‘Son of the Father’.

In John’s gospel, too, Jesus of Nazareth, born at a particular historical moment and into a particular cultural setting – is identified with one who transcends space and time, the universal Christ. According to John, in the beginning is the Word (divine reason), without whom nothing is made, in whom is the life which enlightens everyone. It is this way, life and truth which is enfleshed in Jesus and which reveals the true heart of God (a contextual reading of John 14.6). Those who oppose his works of mercy and liberation, though they may think they are championing obedience to the literal words of God, are rejecting this truth.

In this way, the world’s (and religion’s) expectations are turned upside down: the Almighty stoops to wash feet and is executed for blasphemy and sedition.

While the exact mechanisms of redemption remain open to debate, the crucifixion and resurrection of one in whom humanity and divinity are in perfect concurrence is presented as the pivotal event in history. Salvation is offered, not from the vengeance of an authoritarian deity but from the personal and social consequences of failure to love. People and communities need no longer be trapped by hatred and fear, pursuit of wealth, power and all that does not, in the end, satisfy; death no more reigns.

It might appear that, while following Jesus is the way to salvation, there may be other ways of relating to Christ, whether recognised and named or not. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God in them (1 John 4.16). God will not force people to choose the way of love and truth, but those who are open can be transformed and play their part in God’s transformation of a world wracked by division and pain into a realm of love and peace.

This is not a mere liberal embracing of all faiths. In examining any tradition, it may be worth asking whether it leads to good news or bad for the poor and downtrodden, whether its followers are supported in becoming more Christ-like or encouraged to devalue and mistreat their neighbour. In Luke’s gospel, when Jesus faces hostility from the pious, he proclaims that Wisdom is justified by all her children (Luke 7.35, see also Matthew 11.19). He often draws on the legacy of Wisdom, whom some identify with the Spirit: present from the dawn of creation, those who search for her find her, and her path is the path of justice (Proverbs 3.19-20, 8.17, 20).

Superficial judgement is not enough: faith communities may be divided between the wise and unwise, those who cultivate understanding and compassion and those who spurn them. “The wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere,” writes James in his epistle (letter). “And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace” (James 3.17-18).

There are indeed New Testament passages which might be read as indicating that it is only Christians (or indeed some Christians) who will be granted God’s mercy and life. But readers of the Gospels need not struggle to understand why a God held up as a model of generosity by, and embodied in, Jesus would condemn people who, faced with a host of competing belief systems, have picked the wrong one, especially since some will have been put off by misdeeds committed in the name of Christ. God is indeed loving and kind.

The Bible is complex, and those reading it will often draw different conclusions. However those who believe that it is evident from Scripture that non-Christians will be condemned are making unfounded assumptions. Indeed, as Christians, we are at risk of constructing images of God which lead us to dangerous judgementalism towards our neighbour and complacency in our own lives (Matthew 7). It is only by seeking and serving Christ in others, and opening ourselves to grow towards the One in whom humanity is fulfilled and divinity incarnate, that we can be freed and made whole.

Savi Hensman was born in Sri Lanka. She works in the voluntary sector in London. She is an Ekklesia associate.

Elie Wiesel on Darfur

Remarks delivered by Elie Wiesel at the Darfur Emergency Summit, convened at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York on July 14, 2004, by the American Jewish World Service and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.Sudan has become today’s world capital of human pain, suffering and agony. There, one part of the population has been - and still is - subjected by another part, the dominating part, to humiliation, hunger and death. For a while, the so-called civilized world knew about it and preferred to look away. Now people know. And so they have no excuse for their passivity bordering on indifference. Those who, like you my friends, try to break the walls of their apathy deserve everyone’s support and everyone’s solidarity. Sudan has become today’s world capital of human pain, suffering and agony. There, one part of the population has been - and still is - subjected by another part, the dominating part, to humiliation, hunger and death. For a while, the so-called civilized world knew about it and preferred to look away. Now people know. And so they have no excuse for their passivity bordering on indifference. Those who, like you my friends, try to break the walls of their apathy deserve everyone’s support and everyone’s solidarity.This gathering was organized by several important bodies. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Committee on Conscience (Jerry Fowler), the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, the American Jewish World Service (Ruth Messinger) and several other humanitarian organizations.

As for myself, I have been involved in the efforts to help Sudanese victims for some years. It was a direct or indirect consequence of a millennium lecture I had given in the White House on the subject, “The Perils of Indifference”. After I concluded, a woman in the audience rose and said: “I am from Rwanda.” She asked me how I could explain the international community’s indifference to the Rwandan massacres. I turned to the President who sat at my right and said: “Mr. President, you better answer this question. You know as well as we do that the Rwanda tragedy, which cost from 600,000 to 800,000 victims, innocent men, women and children, could have been averted. Why wasn’t it?” His answer was honest and sincere: “It is true, that tragedy could have been averted. That’s why I went there to apologize in my personal name and in the name of the American people. But I promise you: it will not happen again.”

The next day I received a delegation from Sudan and friends of Sudan, headed by a Sudanese refugee bishop. They informed me that two million Sudanese had already died. They said, “You are now the custodian of the President’s pledge. Let him keep it by helping stop the genocide in Sudan.”

That brutal tragedy is still continuing, now in Sudan’s Darfur region. Now its horrors are shown on television screens and on front pages of influential publications. Congressional delegations, special envoys and humanitarian agencies send back or bring back horror-filled reports from the scene. A million human beings, young and old, have been uprooted, deported. Scores of women are being raped every day, children are dying of disease hunger and violence.

How can a citizen of a free country not pay attention? How can anyone, anywhere not feel outraged? How can a person, whether religious or secular, not be moved by compassion? And above all, how can anyone who remembers remain silent?

As a Jew who does not compare any event to the Holocaust, I feel concerned and challenged by the Sudanese tragedy. We must be involved. How can we reproach the indifference of non-Jews to Jewish suffering if we remain indifferent to another people’s plight?

It happened in Cambodia, then in former Yugoslavia, and in Rwanda, now in Sudan. Asia, Europe, Africa: Three continents have become prisons, killing fields and cemeteries for countless innocent, defenseless populations. Will the plague be allowed to spread?

“Lo taamod al dam réakha” is a Biblical commandment. “Thou shall not stand idly by the shedding of the blood of thy fellow man.” The word is not “akhikha,” thy Jewish brother, but “réakha,” thy fellow human being, be he or she Jewish or not. All are entitled to live with dignity and hope. All are entitled to live without fear and pain.

Not to assist Sudan’s victims today would for me be unworthy of what I have learned from my teachers, my ancestors and my friends, namely that God alone is alone: His creatures must not be.

What pains and hurts me most now is the simultaneity of events. While we sit here and discuss how to behave morally, both individually and collectively, over there, in Darfur and elsewhere in Sudan, human beings kill and die.

Should the Sudanese victims feel abandoned and neglected, it would be our fault - and perhaps our guilt.

That’s why we must intervene.

If we do, they and their children will be grateful for us. As will be, through them, our own.

Eritrea’s Ancient Church Weather’s Modern Pressures

by Peter Martell Wed Apr 25, 2:53 AM ET 

DEBRE BIZEN, Eritrea (AFP) - Wrapped in white blankets against the chill air at an all-night vigil, Eritrean Orthodox monks sway slowly as they chant.

The community of around 200 men lead an austere life hardly changed since the Debre Bizen monastery was founded some 650 years ago. They keep a low profile in a country where religion is a delicate matter.

“Life here is simple,” said one monk staring at clouds, silver in the moonlight, floating far below the community’s scattered collection of simple stone dormitories.

The site, which lies east of the capital Asmara on a rocky peak 2,400 metres (7,920 feet) high, can be reached only by a breathtaking two-hour climb up narrow and twisting paths.

“We devote our time to prayer, to God. We are kept busy with that, we are happy and are at peace,” he said.

The government says it wants to keep national unity in this country of about 4.2 million, split equally between Muslims and Christians, and people are reluctant to talk about religion — even at this remote outpost.

But human rights groups and opposition reports say all is not well in the ancient Church, which was established in Eritrea in the fourth century.

Patriarch Abune Antonios, named the Church’s leader in 2004, was removed from his post in January last year.

The human rights group Amnesty International attributes his removal to his criticism of alleged state interference in church activities, including a crackdown on several evangelical Christian movements popular with some young Eritreans.

But the government dismissed the allegations, saying it was an internal Church matter.

Eritrea has reacted angrily to human rights organisations, which regularly accuse authorities here of religious persecution particularly against unregistered evangelical congregations.

A US State Department report last month branded Eritrea as a “country of particular concern” over the “government’s continuing severe violation of religious freedom,” including what it said were the arrests of hundreds of worshippers.

Asmara denounces such reports as “fabrications” and “childish plots by colonialists” using religious issues to “create division and conflict” in a bid to weaken the country.

The information ministry recently singled out Washington in a caustic editorial, posted on the ministry’s website, saying “the US’s daily pretentious cry for religious freedom is nothing but a means to establish political domination and subordination by creating division among peoples…”

The ministry also slammed what it said was a bid “to defile religion by using it as a political tool to satisfy one’s own gluttony.”

Eritrean Information Minister Ali Abdu himself angrily dismissed claims last December that the government had wrested financial control away from the Church as “rubbish.”

He rejected a US State Department report that Church offerings now go into a state-controlled fund — from which the priests’ salaries are then paid — and that Church leaders must now perform military and national service, from which they were formerly exempt.

Amnesty meanwhile says that Abune, still recognised as the legitimate Church head by the Coptic Orthodox headquarters in the Egyptian city of Alexandria, has been held under house arrest since January. A recent statement by the human rights watchdog expressed concern about the health of 79-year-old cleric.

This followed a statement posted on an opposition website in February charging that three security officers and two priests had forcibly stripped Abune of his chain and sceptre, symbols of his spiritual authority. The statement was allegedly signed by monks, priests and deacons of the Orthodox Church.

“We have been following the sad developments in our Church and the suffering of His Holiness for the sake of his faith and the Church he loves so much,” it read.

The patriarch’s failure to pronounce the Easter benediction earlier this month on the most solemn day in the Church calendar raised eyebrows. The blessing was given instead by Abune Dioskoros, whom the state-run media described as a “senior religious leader.”

In the quiet of Debre Bizen, such earthly concerns seem far away and monks insist they know nothing about the allegations.

“I don’t want to talk about that, I don’t know anything about it,” said a young novice nervously, carrying a Bible in a cloth bag by his side.

Prayer dominates life in the monastery, which lies above the town of Nefasit, 20 kilometres (12 miles) east of Asmara, and is accessible only to men.

In a small dining room lined with portraits of past spiritual leaders, monks preparing a simple supper look forward to the future.

“Eritrea had to suffer for many years in the fight to be free,” said one monk laying out the traditional injera, a sour flat bread, on a communal plate.

“There was much hardship, but the monastery never closed. Life is still not easy, but the church goes on.”

South Hill UMC’s New Member

Rev. Barry Burkholder has finally - after two years - accepted the transfer of an openly gay person to the South Hill United Methodist Church in Virginia.

Said gentleman (his name is not known) applied for membership in 2005 after having worshipped there for a while, joined the choir and participated in other fellowship. When he asked to join the church, he was denied because he was gay. This decision was appealed to the bishop and annual conference. All told the then-pastor Edward H. Johnson to accept the man if he was willing to take the various oaths required for membership. Johnson then appealed these ruling all the way to the United Methodist Church’s version of the Supreme Court, called “The Judicial Council”. Much to everyone’s surprise, Johnson won. The Judicial Council ruled that a pastor, as the head of the congregation, had the right to accept or reject any membership application she or he may see fit. This ruling caused something of a fire-storm in the United Methodist Church, primarily among the bishops, clergy and lay leadership. While the UMC bars “open and practicing homosexuals” from becoming clergy or being appointed to churches, it has never made any such restriction for membership. In fact, the UMC has always had a very open and welcoming membership policy. For my own part, I believe that there were two miscarriages of justice in that case. The first is that a United Methodist minister was permitted to reject a man from membership to the church in spite of the fact that he could make every necessary vow. He was able to confess Jesus Christ as his savior, put is trust in His grace, and offer his loyalty to the universal church and the United Methodist Church. These have always been our criteria. We ask that everyone admit that they are a sinner before God and that they are working on their sin. We do not ask that a person delineate each and every sin, and that they even agree to what are sins and what are not. Methodists have always opposed gambling. I would be turning away many good Christian souls at the door if I rejected for membership every person who went to Atlantic City once in a while and thought there was nothing wrong with that. For that matter, I’d turn even more away if I rejected everyone who like a beer with a steak once in a while. We do not demand perfection. We demand a willingness to work on perfection.

The second miscarriage of justice was that the person was denied for being a person who our own theology claims is “a person of sacred worth” even in and as a practicing homosexual. The pastor thought that the theology of the church was not strict enough, rejected it in violation of his covenantal obligation to uphold the church’s teaching, and then claimed that a “person of sacred worth” is not worthy enough to be a self-professed disciple of Jesus Christ in communion with other such disciples.

That is mind boggling!
 

I offer a big and warm welcome to my new brother in Christ and within the connection of the United Methodist Church, whoever you are. In fact, I applaud you for sticking with it when you could have left, gone down the street, and found another church. Your commitment has made us better Christians.

Churches Warned to Follow Campaign Rules

Posted by North West Arkansas Online’s Morning News. Click here.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A lawyer for the United Methodist Church is cautioning clergy against getting caught up in the presidential race as the 2008 election heats up.

The Internal Revenue Service has been warning churches and nonprofits that they risk losing their tax-exempt status by backing a candidate or engaging in partisan activism.

“Churches should take stands on appropriate issues, but it cannot be a substantial part of their ministry,” said Jim Allen, general counsel of the Methodist Council on Finance and Administration.

To protect themselves, Allen said congregations should not invite candidates to speak from the pulpit and avoid statements at any church function that could be interpreted as endorsing or opposing a candidate. Churches, however, are allowed to distribute voters education guides and encourage people to vote.

Pro-Gay Rights Religious Billboard Vandalized

by 365Gay.com Newscenter StaffPosted: April 26, 2007 - 11:00 am ET  in this place.

(Indianapolis, Indiana) Church leaders sponsoring a pro-gay religious billboard campaign in Indianapolis say they will not be deterred after several of the huge signs were painted out.

One of the billboards was completely obliterated with black spray paint.  Another had the words “lie, lie, lie,” spray painted in red.

The campaign is being coordinated by Jesus Metropolitan Community Church of Indianapolis, with support from Faith In America and Metropolitan Community Churches worldwide.  Faith In America is a national organization devoted to ending the injustice of religion-based bigotry against gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people.

Twenty-two billboards featuring pro-gay Biblical messages were put up throughout Indianapolis. The campaign which began earlier this month (story) is to last 30 days.

One billboard proclaims “David loved Jonathan More than women. II Samuel 1:26″ another says “Jesus affirmed a gay couple.  Matthew 8:5-13.” Yet another says “Ruth loved Naomi as Adam loved Eve. Genesis 2:24; Ruth 1:14.”

Police said that to deface the signs the vandals would have needed an extension ladder. A police department spokesperson said that it would be hard to find the culprits, unless they were caught in the act.

Police stations throughout the city have been told to be on the lookout for suspicious activity around the other billboards.

Jesus MCC also has distributed about 2,000 yard signs around the city. Many of them have been pulled out of the ground in front of LGBT supporters homes.

“There was a sense of disappointment, a sense of shock, the church’s pastor, Rev. Jeff Miner, told WRTV.

Milner said he hopes a community sense of outrage helps spur debate. 

“We’re going to share a positive, powerful message how the Bible affirms gay people and we know there is going to be some opposition as we try to get that message out here,” he said.

No one has claimed responsibility for the vandalism.

The Indiana Family Institute which has been pressing for a constitutional amendment to bar same-sex marriage denounced the vandalism but also criticized the billboards messages.

“I think homosexuals are noted in the Bible in a couple of key passages that were an example of sexual sin that is decried by God,” said spokesperson Curt Smith.

Earlier this month a proposed amendment banning same-sex marriage and likely barring any benefits for unmarried couples - same, or opposite-sex - died in a committee at the legislature.

The Enemy of My Enemy . . .

There is that old saying: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

 

With that in mind, I offer a hearty congratulations to Wiccans and Neo-Pagans who today won the right to have their pentagram placed on U.S. military gravestone markers. After nearly a month of legal bickering, the Department of Veteran’s Affairs finally allowed the pentagram to be used on the grave markers of soldiers who confessed to be neo-pagans or wiccans.

 

Each Wiccan Altar Is Crafted As It Was To Be My Own

Religious faith has been increasingly marginalized and repressed in the public square of American discourse. Please do not give in to certain columnists and commentators who like to suggest otherwise. Under the banner of “offensive”, free speech (religious and otherwise) is becoming a rarer and more precious commodity. Sometimes, in my more disillusioned moments, I suspect that I might live to see a push to prevent churches from celebrating Easter on the premise that the raising of Jesus from the dead is offensive to supporters of capital punishment, Italians, pagans, Jews, governors, and members of the Israeli Sanhedrin (all of whose decision was over turned that day).

 

This victory by Wiccans is a victory for all people of faith, allowing us to keep our religious integrity, to worship the divine as we each see fit, and to express that faith openly to anyone who might come across our tombstone.

 

A good day for all of us…

 

See AP Story here.